• State Resolved
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 4 replies
  • Subscribers 54 subscribers
  • Views 529 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Support feedback
Options
Options
Related

This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

Does CCS5 support the TMS320DM642

Ossian Riday
Prodigy 70 points
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TMS320DM642

Hi,

I'm currently using the TMS320DM642 with CCS3 and would like to upgrade to CCS5.

I have two quick questions:

1. Does CCS5 support the TMS320DM642?

2. Does the XDS100 programmer support the TMS320DM642?  I have seen conflicting information on the TI web site about this, hence the question.

Thanks,

Ossian

  • 0
    TI__Guru**** 472851 points

    Hello Ossian,

    Ossian Riday said:
    1. Does CCS5 support the TMS320DM642?

    Yes

    Ossian Riday said:
    2. Does the XDS100 programmer support the TMS320DM642?

    No

    Ossian Riday said:
    I have seen conflicting information on the TI web site about this, hence the question.

    This site is pretty accurate regarding XDS100:

    http://processors.wiki.ti.com/index.php/Xds100#Features_NOT_supported.C2.A0

    Thanks

    ki

  • 0 in reply to Ki
    Prodigy 70 points

    Hi Ki,

    Thanks for the clarification.  

    I'm looking for a less expensive programming alternative to the XDS510.  Essentially I have a board with the TMS320DM642 and flash memory and I would like to program the flash memory using JTAG through the TMS320DM642, so I don't need all the features of the XDS510.

    Are you aware of any less expensive JTAG programming solutions that are compatible with both the TMS320DM642 and CCS5?

    Thanks,

    Ossian 

  • 0 in reply to Ossian Riday
    TI__Guru**** 472851 points

    The XDS510 Parallel Port emulators are probably your best bet right now for low cost (assuming you have a parallel port on your PC). There are plans to support an emulator to fill the gap between XDS100 and XDS510/560 in terms of cost and performance but those will not be available until later in the year.

  • 0 in reply to Ki
    Prodigy 70 points

    Ki,

    Thanks, I'll look into the Parallel Port solution.  Good to know a less expensive alternative to the XDS510 is in the works.

    Thanks,

    Ossian