This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

CCS5 "Include path not found"



I have created a new platform for our project.  I have multiple project users who put the platform and project on different disk drives. If I put an absolute path into Package Repositories then I get an warning on one computer or another.  I tried to create a generic path to the repository but CCS5 is malforming the path name.

The value I entered for Build properties in XDCTools under "Package Repositories" is "${workspace_loc:/${ProjName}}..\Firmware\packages".  The value I see in the error message is "E:\NanoScan2\Firmware\workspace\Firmware\packages". Note that the ".." (dot dot) is missing. 

I suppose I could move the repository into a workspace but this seems wrong - workspace should be independent of the repository.

  • Hi Kurt,

    can you please explain in a bit further detail?  Are you setting these up as build or path variables?  Do you enter this in the file search path or include options?

    Have a look at these topics and please keep us informed whether they help

    http://processors.wiki.ti.com/index.php/Portable_Projects

    http://processors.wiki.ti.com/index.php/Include_paths_and_options

    http://processors.wiki.ti.com/index.php/Project_Sharing

    Best Regards,
    Lisa

  • "The value I entered for Build properties in XDCTools under "Package Repositories" is..."

    these are XDC properties...see attached picture

  • sorry to repeat myself but this is not build or path variables.  none of the links address XDC paths or package repositories

    this is about XDC settings. please try to understand that the question is about XDCTools Package Repositories. please look at the attached picture.

  • Hi Kurt,

    yes I know, however you are using variables in your directory/path so I wanted to see if we could verify these variables are defined in the correct place as it seems they are not being resolved properly.   I am also going to try and get an extra pair of eyes on this.   As soon as we have further feedback I will let you know.

    Best Regards,

    Lisa

  • Hi Lisa,

    Sorry for the confusion.  The last post was for the fella who closed this post as Answered. I reopened it then posted again.

    I just realized I was missing a ".." (dot dot) - needed two but only put in one.  Now it finds the package just fine.

    Thank you for your patience.

    Kurt

  • Hi Kurt,

    no problem and glad to hear all is well now with the tools.

    All the best with development.

    Best Regards,
    Lisa