• State Resolved
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 3 replies
  • Subscribers 54 subscribers
  • Views 6947 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Support feedback
Options
Options
Related

This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

Code Composer 5.1 gmake: Nothing to be done for `all'.

Robert Coburn
Intellectual 470 points


I am receiving the message  gmake: Nothing to be done for `all'. when attempting to perform a build, yet when I do a clean  CC5 does attempt to delete the object files. The make file is being generated. This seems to be  something down inside eclipse.

 

A little background. I am attempting to place my Code Composer projects in my Synergy Configuration Management system. Initially all 5  projects built, but once I  exited Code Composer to build them from a command line script only 3 of the projects built. Now I am back in Code Composer, and only 1 project builds

I have no idea where to start looking

 

Version 5.1.0.09000

 

Bob Coburn

  • 0
    TI__Guru*** 130875 points

    Hi Bob,

    I would like to ask for a bit further information/clarification.

    - do you make any modifications?

    - have you been able to verify the .out file behaviour?  Ie do they get deleted?  If there is already a .out file in the projects folders, usually CCS will generate this message as it typically means the project has already been built and this is one indicator that is used.

    -  can you provide more information on the behaviour you see?  Is your script trying to do a build?  Rebuild?  Clean and build?

    Best Regards,
    Lisa

  • 0 in reply to Lisa TI
    Intellectual 470 points

    Lisa,

    Thanks for the reply.

    It turns out that the library file I was creting (.lib) was write protected by my CM systemand not getting deleted, even with a clean the  .pp and .o files were getting deleted. I don't know why the rm /f on the library was not deleting it, but after that the compiler belived the library did not need to be rebuilt.

    Consider this resolved

     

    Thank you

    Bob Coburn

  • 0 in reply to Robert Coburn
    TI__Guru*** 130875 points

    Hi Bob,

    no worries.  Glad it is now sorted and all the best with development.

    Thanks for the update.

    Best Regards,
    Lisa