We are doing mixed C / C++ development for 64xx.
A concern is the TI impl. of stdbool.h which defines bool to be _Bool for C, etc.
The problem is TI_CGT_C6000_7.4.1/include/stdbool.h for C is "typedef unsigned int _Bool" -- which means sizeof(bool) is 4 whereas my the same source compiled for C++ shows sizeof(bool) is 1.
This means that all my shared structs that I compile with both C and C++ need to be conditionalized for "bool" since stdbool.h bool for C is different than intrinsic c++ bool.
Why would having sizeof(bool) be different in C vs C++ be a good idea? I don't think this is what C99 had in mind.
BTW the "unsigned int" impl works on 5510 just fine. 16 bit MAU. :-)
dave
bool.c allocates 0x40 .far
#include <stdbool.h>
bool foo[16];
bool.cpp allocates 0x10 .far
#include <stdbool.h>
bool foo[16];