• State Resolved
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 1 reply
  • Subscribers 53 subscribers
  • Views 601 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Support feedback
Options
Options
Related

This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

Which compiler provide less code size with all optimization either IAR or CCS?

vinoth s1
Intellectual 660 points

Is IAR or CCS TI C/C++ Compiler will output less code size?

What are the advantages of CCS TI compiler over IAR?

I ported a code from IAR to CCS. With IAR it is 49.8KB and with CCS it is 51.5KB with best optimization settings.

With this i am thinking IAR is best.

I need all your opinions and suggesstions

Thanks in Advance

  • 0
    TI__Guru**** 253230 points

    vinoth s1 said:
    I ported a code from IAR to CCS. With IAR it is 49.8KB and with CCS it is 51.5KB with best optimization settings.

    That's not unusual.  Neither is it unusual for things to be the other way around.  Both the IAR and TI compilers are good about conserving memory.  But they go about the details differently.  That being the case, the results will differ from one application to the next.

    Thanks and regards,

    -George