• State Resolved
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 5 replies
  • Subscribers 52 subscribers
  • Views 924 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Support feedback
Options
Options
Related

This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

Missing Defect History

Jes Martin Poblete
Prodigy 50 points

I'm currently working with the 6.2.0 C28x TI compiler and I'm looking through the errata. I'm having trouble finding ID SDSCM00008685 in your the defects database, and it completely disappears from the defecthistory after 6.2.3. What happened to this issue? How do I find more information?


-Jes

  • 0
    TI__Guru**** 249680 points

    Jes Martin Poblete said:
    I'm having trouble finding ID SDSCM00008685

    I can see this record using the internal view.  It is an error that this appears in DefectHistory.txt.  This bug is over 10 years old.  It is specific to the C6000 compiler, not C2000.  It does not apply to you.  Feel free to ignore it.  I'll let the the development team know this occurred.

    Thanks and regards,

    -George

  • 0 in reply to George Mock
    Prodigy 50 points
    Hi George,

    Thanks for the reply. I'm looking through the defecthistory, and in general, it's difficult to find the known issues just by browsing the read-only section of the SDOWP. Is there a way to look through them? I went to the SDOWP page, and searched from the personal queries->all SDSCM records (modifying the default search).

    For example, I can't find the following:
    SDSCM00018698
    SDSCM00030125
    SDSCM00033401
    SDSCM00033900
    SDSCM00035051

    Note that the ones I listed above do not appear past 6.2.3, similar to the one in the previous post.

    I'm working on an analysis of the errata and sometimes the defect history doesn't have the detail I need to make an assessment.

    Regards,
    Jes
  • 0 in reply to Jes Martin Poblete
    TI__Guru**** 249680 points

    Further investigation shows that it is a mistake that any of these issues ...

    Jes Martin Poblete said:
    SDSCM00018698
    SDSCM00030125
    SDSCM00033401
    SDSCM00033900
    SDSCM00035051

    ever appeared in the defect history.  The same is true for SDSCM00008685  from your first post.  This error was corrected starting with version 6.2.4.  

    I apologize for the confusion.

    Thanks and regards,

    -George

  • 0 in reply to George Mock
    Prodigy 50 points

    Does this mean that all issues which were reported in the DefectHistory for 6.2.0 that disappear in 6.2.4 were erroneous reports?


    -Jes