Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TPS2372
Tool/software:
dear TI team,
Why do we need the huge capacitance after TPS2372?
Can we reduce the quantity? What is the side effect if we reduce it?
Thank you.
During transition, the VDD-RTN voltage will drop so you need enough hold up cap (especially if there is a voltage difference between the two PoE ports). I recommend you keep what is shown in the reference design as it has been tested. thanks!
Can we move these capacitors to be closed to the side of PWM controller(PGND.
If it is OK, we only need one set capacitors closed to PWM instead of 2 sets closed to PD1 & PD2.
Refer to schematic: PMP23366 Schematic
move C25,C26,C87 to PGND
Remove C34,C35,C88 for reducing cost
Hi Felix, unfortunately i do not recommend this. VDD-RTN cap must be able to minimize the amount of inrush when the second port gets plugged in, otherwise, the PD controller will fail inrush spec.
does it need to have smooth transition (no drop in output voltage) when one port is plugged in and the other port gets plugged? then i suggest you keep the current design in your schematic and unpopulate the components during your testing to prove it out on your board. as i recall, we tried alot of different approaches and our implementation worked well.