This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
Hello,
I have already used the TI Webench Designer for a number of DC/DC voltage converter designs and have been generally pleased with the results. A few days ago I used the application again to see what it suggested for getting slightly more current out of a buck regulator design it had suggested before. To my surprise, the smallest footprint it could come up with was nearly twice as large. I got the same results even when I put in the original parameters I had used for the first design. It seems that the difference is that it is now only recommending electrolytic and tantalum caps and not MLCCs as it has done in the past. Does anyone know why this has changed? I understand that MLCCs have their issues, but they can still be significantly over specified and still be smaller than what is being recommended. Is there something newly discovered about MLCCs that I don't know that made TI change their mind as to their suitability?
Any advice would be much appreciated.
Matt,
To reproduce your problem we would like to know more: Could you tell us which device you are designing with and what are your design specs?
Thanks
Sure, no problem. Thanks for you help.
I used the following specs with Webench:
VinMin = 34.0V
VinMax = 46.0V
Vout = 30.0V
Iout = 1.1A
When I use those specs today, I get a footprint of 380 mm^2 and it suggests electrolytic caps, but when I used webench in November of last year, it generated the following design: (I'm sorry if it's hard to read, but I can't seem to attach the pdf it generated for me)
Device = TPS54360DDA
Topology = Buck
Created = 11/30/12 9:19:42 PM
BOM Cost = $4.46
Total Pd = 2.04 W
Footprint = 234.0 mm2
BOM Count = 12
1. Cboot MuRata GRM155R71A104KA01D
Series= X7R
1 $0.01 Cap= 100.0 nF
VDC= 10.0 V
IRMS= 0.0 A
0402 8mm2
2. Ccomp MuRata GRM033R60J103KA01D
Series= X5R
1 $0.10 Cap= 10.0 nF
VDC= 6.3 V
IRMS= 0.0 A
0201 6mm2
3. Ccomp2 Kemet C0603C470J5GACTU
Series= C0G/NP0
1 $0.01 Cap= 47.0 pF
VDC= 50.0 V
IRMS= 0.0 A
0603 10mm2
4. Cin MuRata GRM32ER72A225KA35L
Series= X7R
1 $0.38 Cap= 2.2 µF
ESR= 7.0 mOhm
VDC= 100.0 V
IRMS= 4.4 A
1210 23mm2
5. Cout MuRata GRM32ER72A225KA35L
Series= X7R
1 $0.38 Cap= 2.2 µF
ESR= 7.0 mOhm
VDC= 100.0 V
IRMS= 4.4 A
1210 23mm2
6. D1 Diodes Inc. DFLS1100-7 1 $0.19 VF@Io= 770.0 mV
VRRM= 100.0 V PowerDI123 22mm2
7. L1 Coilcraft XAL5050-223MEB 1 $0.83 L= 22.0 µH
DCR= 100.0 mOhm
XAL5050 54mm2
8. Rcomp Vishay-Dale CRCW04024K75FKED
Series= CRCW..e3
1 $0.01 Res= 4.75 kOhm
Power= 63.0 mW
Tolerance= 1.0%
0402 8mm2
9. Rfbb Vishay-Dale CRCW040210K2FKED
Series= CRCW..e3
1 $0.01 Res= 10.2 kOhm
Power= 63.0 mW
Tolerance= 1.0%
0402 8mm2
10. Rfbt Vishay-Dale CRCW0402374KFKED
Series= CRCW..e3
1 $0.01 Res= 374.0 kOhm
Power= 63.0 mW
Tolerance= 1.0%
0402 8mm2
11. Rt Vishay-Dale CRCW040268K1FKED
Series= CRCW..e3
1 $0.01 Res= 68.1 kOhm
Power= 63.0 mW
Tolerance= 1.0%
0402 8mm2
WEBENCH
®
Design
Copyright © 2012, Texas Instruments Incorporated 2 ti.com/webench
WEBENCH
®
Design Report TPS54360DDA : TPS54360DDA 34.0V-46.0V to 30.0V @ 1.1A November 30, 2012 21:20:17 GMT-8
# Name Manufacturer Part Number Quantity Price Properties Footprint
12. U1 Texas Instruments TPS54360DDA 1 $2.52 Switcher
R-PDSO-G8 57mm2
Hello Matt,
Thank you for your interest in Texas Instruments' power management solutions and for bringing this issue to our attention.
As a work around in the mean time, you can click "Select Alternate Part" for Cout and next, select "Create Custom Part". Here you can add cumulative specs for the ceramic cap and quantity.
We will provide a solution as soon as possible.
Regards,
Flora
Flora
Hello Matt,
The revised TPS54360 WEBENCH model is already available on line.
Best Regards,
Not sure where to post this, but...
I've done a webench desigh using TPS54329E 6.0-16.0Vin, 5.0Vout 0.7A.
Webench lists 22uF ceramics for Cin & Cout.
Do these values take into account dc-bias?
Rick Barnich
Hi Rich,
Voltage derating is taken into account for Cout.
Best Regards,
Flora