This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

TPS62200 about webench simulation

Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TPS62200, SWITCHERPRO, TINA-TI, TPS62740, TPS62240

Hi,

Could you tell me about TPS62200 webench simulation?
Customer simulation was performed following conditions.

◇Vin=5V Vout=3.3V Iout=0.1A

However, The following images are displayed.
Error phase margin in the intial state.


I want to secure the phase.
In there method to change a part,
and tosecure phase margin?

Best Regards,
Yusuke/Japan Disty

  • Yusuke-san,

    We are investigating this issue. The design should not be created if the phase margin is too low.

  • Britt-san,

    Thank you for you for your support.
    Please tell me when you know what this is.

    Best Regards,
    Yusuke/Japan Disty

  • Hi,

    Can I get the information?
    If you need more information or if  I should  clarify my comment ,
    please let me know.

    Best Regards,
    Yusuke/Japan Disty

  • Yusuke-san,

    We are working on your problem now and will be getting back to you soon.

    Bonnie Baker
  • Yusuke-san,

    This is a relatively older device which is supported by SwitcherPro Designer so we will need to dig deeper to find out about the loop response model implemented within the software tool. I am still trying to see if I can get some information regarding the internal parameters used for the model, especially the internal compensation design.

    In the meanwhile, I went through the design recommended by WEBENCH and the design itself is following the datasheet guidelines correctly when it comes to picking the inductor, input and output cap and the resistor dividers alongwith the compensation network components. This information starts on page 11 of the datasheet. I did a transient model simulation using TINA-TI with the exact design reported by WEBENCH and the waveforms look just fine.

    I will get back to you once I have more information regarding the loop model.

    Regards,
    Amod

  • Amod-san,

    Thank you for your kind support and information.
    I am waiting for your update.

    Best Regards,
    Yusuke/Japan Disty

  • Yusuke-san,

    I had extensive discussion with the internal design team related to this device. The datasheet guidelines on which the design is based are good and with a similar design case as yours, the phase margin is over 50 degrees and stable. The model is not estimating the phase accurately. However, we cannot really fix this device now as it belongs to the SwitcherPro tool category to which we do not make anymore updates or major fixes. Therefore, we would recommend that for your analysis, you can use the transient models under the "Tools & software" category on the product folder page of TPS62200. You might also want to try other newer ICs like TPS62240 or the TPS62740 family within the WEBENCH tool to see if they fit your needs.

    Sorry for the inconvenience caused. Please do let me know if you have any further questions.

    Regards,
    Amod

  • Amod-san,

    Thank you for you kind support and description.
    I understood the situation.
    I will contact you if anything happens.

    Best Regards,
    Yusuke/Japan Disty