• State Resolved
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 2 replies
  • Answers 1 answer
  • Subscribers 51 subscribers
  • Views 257 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Support feedback
Options
Options

This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

CC2642R: How to only remove the two button menus?

SY Yoon
Genius 3380 points
Part Number: CC2642R
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: SYSCONFIG

Hi, 

I want to use the on-chip OAD. 

So I'm using ble5_simple_peripheral_oad_onchip_cc26x2r1lp_persistent_app and simple_peripheral_oad_onchip_CC26X2R1_LAUNCHXL_tirtos_ccs project.

I removed the two buttons menu and display from application project to decrease flash consumption as below link guide.

https://e2e.ti.com/support/wireless-connectivity/bluetooth-group/bluetooth/f/bluetooth-forum/879276/cc2642r-cc2652r-how-to-remove-two-buttons-menu-two_btn_menu-and-display-from-simple_peripheral-project

But I want to use the display function, only remove the two button menus.

I want to check log like the project_zero so I will try to add the UartLog instead of disply_printf.

Because the display_printf seems to require two button menus.

Which one does TI recommend for decreasing memory consumption, display_printf or uartlog?

And then I change IO Capabilities in Only Display Device and disable Two Button Manu - Active Items Only as below.

Does this have problems?

  • +1
    TI__Guru** 101450 points

    Hi,

    With newer SDK, you can remove the display directly from SysConfig (the option is in RF STACKS > BLE > Advanced SettingsConfigure Extended Settings > Disable The Display Module).

    On your screenshot,

    - the first line you have highlighted is the device capability used for pairing process. This only impacts the pairing method used by the devices.

    - the second line you have highlighted only modify the way the display is done (but does not disable it)

    SY Yoon said:
    Which one does TI recommend for decreasing memory consumption, display_printf or uartlog?

    Display uses UAR and a few more functions. So, from a flash size perspective, using only UART is a better choice.

    SY Yoon said:
    Because the display_printf seems to require two button menus

    Actually the display_printf can still work without the two-button menus

    I hope this will work,

    Best regards,

  • 0 in reply to Clément
    TI__Guru** 101450 points

    Hi,

    May I ask you if the question is answered?

    If, yes, could you please mark the thread as resolved? This will help other users to benefit from it.

    Thanks and regards,