Part Number: CC2640R2F
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: DRV2605
I'm currently doing a board layout for the CC2640R2F 2.7x2.7 BGA package.
I'm using the PCB symbol YFV0034ALA posted on TI's website.
I've noticed the paste mask pad has a complex shape (approximately square with rounded corners).
This is not so concerning. However, what is concerning is the size of the paste mask pad. The paste mask pad is significantly larger than the solder mask pad, which is in turn larger than the copper pad.
This worries me. It seems like there would be far too much solder, when combined with the solder balls.
Question: Is solder paste required at all with BGA packages?
Question2: Why has the PCB symbol designer chosen to make the paste mask pad area so large?
Here's is another summary of the information, some of it redundant with what I've stated above.
Here are a few notes on my present progress with BGA layout.
Layout is essentially done. Passes all layout software checks (no opens, shorts, track/space sizes and spacings, etc.)
Outstanding issues:
Facts:
1) The solder mask approach is NSMD (Non-Solder Mask defined) - this is where the solder mask is larger than the copper pad, which allows the solder to wrap around the copper pad. The SMD approach is where the solder mask is smaller than the copper pad, which prevents the solder from wrapping over the edge of the copper pad. TI has chosen NSMD...this is their call and I have no disagreements with them. This is the most recommended method across the industry.
2) The paste mask on the TI BGA symbol is larger and shaped differently (complex shape; roughly square w/chamfered corners) than the solder mask pad (which is round), which is larger than the copper pad (which is round). The paste mask on all Non-BGA PCB symbols is not only smaller than the mask pad, but is slightly smaller than the copper pad.
Question/concern: I'm questioning whether the paste mask is so large, it will introduce such a large amount of solder paste (and therefore more solder) that there will be solder bridging. Then there is the question of whether there should be any solder paste at all when soldering the BGAs, which might explain why the paste mask pads are so large, since they will not be used anyway,. But why have any paste mask pad at all...why not just close the pad hole entirely...delete it? Why have any solder paste?
I've brought this up with the layout software folks; there is an active discussion going on right now between myself, the high level support person and the software team. What raised this issue up in the first place is the fact that the software tags (creates/paints?) the BGA paste mask pads a different color than all the other (non-BGA) paste mask pads. This is interesting because the software team doesn't know at this point why this has happened. Could it be there is a size comparison check in the software that triggers the color change as a means of flagging this to be looked at by the layout designer? The software team is scratching their heads at this point.
Regards,
John