This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

LAUNCHXL-CC26X2R1: Question about the AOA angle value of sdk5.10.

Part Number: LAUNCHXL-CC26X2R1


Hi team,

Here's the request from the customer:

Customer found that in the old version of sdk5.10, the value of the angle can be directly obtained than customer wanted to upload the existing angle value directly to the cloud.

Therefore, He wanted to ask which file is used to store the angle value in sdk5.10 and which one is the variable that stores the angle in sdk5.10?

Could you help check this case? Thanks.

Best Regards,                                                       

Nick    

  • Hi Nick,

    Please refer to the file Drivers/AOA/AOA.c and more specifically to the function AOA_getPairAngles().

    For more details please refer to the documentation.

    Bets regards,

  • Hi Clément,

    Here's more further issue about this post:

    1. Customer went to look at the function AOA_getPairAngles() carefully, and his understanding is as follows: the position of the angle result in the AOA_getPairAngles() function is as shown in the figure below, one of the following two figures is #elif RTLS_MASTER, the other is #ifdef RTLS_PASSIVE, they appear successively, and the variables that finally store the angle value are all on antResult->pairAngle[pair]. If using antResult->pairAngle[pair] to store the angle value, the later data will overwrite the previous data, so how to store the data? Or is his understanding above wrong? If the understanding is wrong, which variable is the specific variable that stores the final angle value?
    2. As shown in the figure below, TI officials can implement the transmission of the final angle value to the provided page. Which code file is the angle value transmitted through? Which variable is the transmitted angle value stored in and passed out?

    Best Regards,                                                       

    Nick  

  • Hi Nick,

    Please open a new thread to discuss this issue.

    Best regards,