Other Parts Discussed in Thread: LP-EM-CC2340R5, CC2340R5
Tool/software:
Hi TI team
Recently, we are testing LP-EM-CC2340R5 launch board and LP-EM-CC2745P10 launch board by conduted to get the RF performence.
And we got 1M phy RX sensitivity is about -94.5 dBm in LP-EM-CC2340R5, about 1M phy RX -95.5 dBm for LP-EM-CC2745P10.
but in datasheet, for LP-EM-CC2340R5 1M phy RX sensitivity is -96dBm, and for LP-EM-CC2745P10 is -96.5dBm.
Our surronding is below
image of LP-EM-CC2340R5: host_test_LP_EM_CC2340R5_freertos_ticlang.hex, SDK: simplelink_lowpower_f3_sdk_7_40_00_64
image of LP-EM-CC2340R5: host_test_LP_EM_CC2745R10_Q1_freertos_ticlang.out(apllied in ti.com and download .hex image)
instrument: IQXel-80
envirenment: a RF cable form IQXel-80 port connect to LP_EM_CC2745P10/LP_EM_CC2340R5 SMA port. The capacitance 15pF is connecting to SMA not the Antenna path. And we use Network analyzers to measure the pathloss of the RF cable. And LP_EM_CC2745P10/LP_EM_CC2340R5 is isolated in a Shielded box.
We can not get the performence be like datasheet. May I ask your surronding to test the conducted RF performence? Is it in a Incubator, whose temperature is keeping 25 celsius?
QL
Best Regards