• State
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 0 replies
  • Subscribers 50 subscribers
  • Views 139 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Support feedback
Options
Options
Related

This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

CC2540 BLE stack: coding vs performance

Danny Wong
Intellectual 280 points

http://e2e.ti.com/support/low_power_rf/f/538/p/314465/1093960.aspx#1093960

Thanks for Aslak answering the question on the above post, but I would like to know more about BLE stack. Therefore i create another post. 

Now I know i could put something on periodic session but i would like to clarify something.

1. I would like to know whether the bluetooth part is affected if i put a task that takes a long time to finish.

2. Is it just increased the power consumption if I shorten the periodic time (SBP_PERIODIC_EVT_PERIOD)?

3. As I saw a post in the forum, it is something about building a SPI driver. The reply is negative until one of the TI employee said ble stack 1.3.1 is now support SPI.  Could I say that the osal and hal restricted the development or the use ofCC2540? 

Best Regards

Danny