This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

SPP demo APP Improving throughput(2)

Hi,

This is an additional post to below;

https://e2e.ti.com/support/wireless_connectivity/bluetooth_cc256x/f/660/p/551815/2017436#2017436

My customer is trying to maximize the throughput in their SPP demo based software.
They now understood meanings of each parameters(MaximumFrameSize, TransmitBufferSize and ReceiveBufferSize).
http://processors.wiki.ti.com/index.php/CC256x_MSP430_TI%27s_Bluetooth_Stack_Basic_SPPDemo_APP_Improving_throughput_v14


They still have some questions.
1) In the Wiki, buffer sizes 58, 348, 329, 987, 2303 are tested. What is a reason these sizes are selected ?
 Usually 64, 128, 256 or 10, 100, 1000, etc. are used for buffer size.
 
2) What is the reason throughputs “from sample application to MSP430” are slower than “from MSP430 to sample application” ?

3) What is the main reason the throughput are much slower than baudrates ?

Thanks and regards,
KoT