Other Parts Discussed in Thread: CC2640R2F
Hello,
We’ve been studying both the CC2640R2F and the CC2642R as part of our BT5 study. We’ve been under the impression that the CC2642R has two new features that will make it completely BT5 capable… the additional flash for stack support… and the coded phy in the radio for long range.
We assume the 2640R2F will be mostly BT5, but not completely due to the lack of these features. Is this a correct assumption? Do both chipsets actually have the coded phy and the difference is just flash size?
Regards,
David