• State TI Thinks Resolved
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 3 replies
  • Answers 2 answers
  • Subscribers 51 subscribers
  • Views 328 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Support feedback
Options
Options
Related

This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

CC2650MODA: CC2650MODA vs CC2564MODA

na na78
Guru 16770 points

Part Number: CC2650MODA
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: CC2564MODA, , CC2650, CC2564, BLE-STACK

Hi

CC2564MODA offers HCI interface.

I think HCI will provide benefit for access from external host controller.

However, CC2650MODA will not provide HCI interface.

We want to use CC2650MODA than CC2564 because CC2650 is newer device and it supports BLE4.2.

1.

Could it be possible to implement HCI function into CC2650MODA?

2.

Could you please tell me how to implement firmware to communicate external controller with CC2650MODA?

(UART, SPI, etc)

BestRegards

  • 0
    TI__Guru 57865 points

    Hi.

    CC2564 is a Bluetooth Classic device.

    CC2650 is a Bluetooth low energy device.

    Bluetooth low energy is designed to be hosting the application on-chip rather than accessible through external serial communication such as HCI. If you would like to attempt it anyway, please refer to "hostTest" software example in the BLE-Stack v2.2.2 package, including the vendor specific HCI guide.

  • 0 in reply to J Lindh
    Guru 16770 points

    Hi Joakim

    Thank you for your reply.

    I assume communication between BT module from TI and i.MX from NXP.
    (Don't care BLE or classic)

    1.When we use CC2564MODA, should we need to transplant software stack for MSP430 to i.MX?

    2.When we use CC2650MODA, it is enough to use BLE-Stackv2.2.2 to communicate external i.MX?

    BestRegards

  • 0 in reply to na na78
    TI__Guru 57865 points

    Hi,

    Correct with your assumption, so you either develop code on MSP430 or CC2650.