Hello,
I have a customer trying to get started on the CC2640R2F Launchpad and we've been having some issues with this change in the ltoa function prototype. Changing the compiler back to 16.9.x does indeed solve the compile time issue as referenced in the related thread, but the customer is also seeing a related link stage error from the function being redefined or provided somewhere else and the function prototypes are incompatible.
We have left the runtime library support to be automatic, but could this potentially be from an incompatible library being included? Shouldn't osal.c override any library implementation of the ltoa function anyways?
Would be good to get a listing either on the project zero tirex page or the CC2640R2F landing page describing the recommended compile chain on these examples at this point if they're not going to be updated to support the latest CGT versions with CCS v10.
Munan