This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

Murata / Johanson IPC for 434 MHz?

Genius 3985 points
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: CC1120

Hello,

these IPC make sense and I would be glad to use them.

But: we are at 434 MHz. Is there any plan to issue an according version of IPC's?

regards

  • Hi,

    There are plans of a new version of the CC1120 IPC at 434 MHz. The exact date for samples / release is still too early but a rough indication will be towards Q4 this year.

    Regards,   Richard.

  • Hello Richard,

    do you have any update about the availability of the CC1120 IPC @ 434Mhz ?

    thank you,
    Paolo
  • Hi,

    Originally we planned to release a version of the CC112x IPC at 433 MHz but this was cancelled due to poor interests at the time.

    For the CC13xx generation, there will be a 433 MHz IPC.

    Regards,

       Richard

  • Richard,

    we use CC112x at 433MHz since 'decades' with discrete matching parts and wait for the 433 IPC...

    When you say "it's planned for CC13xx":

    a. when

    b. what it the difference to 112x that should us hinder to use it for this family?

    regards

    Gerhard

  • Hi,

    a. The BOM for the discrete component solution has to be set first. Once, this is set then it normally takes approx. 6 months to release an IPC part with a supplier. The IPC supplier basically reverse engineers the impedance and the filtering characteristics of the original discrete solution with their own substrate technology.

    b. There will be a difference in impedance. The IPC are conjugate matched to the chip family so using a CC13xx IPC on a different platform than CC13xx will not be optimal. When the match is not optimal then the efficiency will be reduced.