This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
Hi PM,
Thank you to have spent time to answer me.
An other question, how can I determinate the matching circuit value between CC2500 and CC2592? Have you got typical value for them ?
Thank you and have a nice day!
Benjamin
Hello Benjamin,
My suggestion to you would be to make a prototype board based on the CC2538-CC2592EM design and test the performance both with the matching network between the chips and without. Look at how the matching has been implemented on the CC2538-CC2592EM - both sides of CC2592. The shunt component between the transceiver and CC2592 is not used, but we found that if you place CC2592 closer to CC2538 than we do in the current reference design, a shunt inductor was needed to compensate some of the inductance lost in the traces.
Hello Eirik,
Thank you for your response.
Distance between the two pads of CC2500 and CC2592 is 2.5mm and i can place them closer.
In fact, I have completly followed the schematic of CC2538-CC2592EM and I wonder:
1) if it was the same schematic by changing CC2538 to CC2500 ie the same impedence matching between CC2500/CC2592 and between CC2592/ANT.
2) Do you think inductor is needed ? If yes, which value? What does DNM mean ?
Thank you to have spent time to anwser me.
Benjamin
Hello Benjamin,
Read the following thread for more info:
http://e2e.ti.com/support/wireless_connectivity/f/964/t/342972.aspx
"DNM" means "Do Not Mount".