I have a TRF960AEVM that I am using to evaluate a switch to ISO15693 tags from ISO14443(A).
The reason for the switch is that we would like to get slightly greater distance than we get with the current (Type 2) tags we are using. We would like to get beyond 6-9cm out to closer to 15-20cm.
Given that 15693 tags require a weaker magnetic field, and are supposed to therefore work at greater distance, I tested 15693 and 14443 comparable size tag detection distance with the TRF960AEVM. Surprisingly, I did not achieve any greater distance with 15693 tags.
The tag sizes used were all smaller than the diagonal of the TRF960AEVM coil, from slightly smaller, to quite a bit. But, no matter the size, the difference between comparable 15693 and 14443 tags was not really relevant.
The magnetic field strengths required by the two standards are given as ranges. Are the results I’m seeing due to the field strengths required being more comparable at the low power and smaller coil size of the TRF960AEVM, resulting in a negligible difference? I do not have the NFC expertise to really understand this immediately.
Any help would be appreciated!