CC2500 matching to CC2590 is a better choice than to use CC2592

Remote

Other Parts Discussed in Thread: CC2592, CC2590, CC2500

If I don't need the extra RF-power that CC2592 can boos, then it seems that CC2590 is a better choice instead of use CC2592.

If I am right the CC2590 can be added directly to CC2500 outport w.o. any matching (the small mismatch is not to bother about). Is that correct?

over 10 years ago

0 PM over 10 years ago

TI__Mastermind 27145 points

Yes, you are right. The following is the interface circuir for your ready reference. Please refer to CC2590 data sheet SWRS080.

Thanks,

0 Remote over 10 years ago in reply to PM

Prodigy 30 points

Hi PM,

Fine! & thanks for a fast response!!!

Jan

0 Matjaz Tome over 10 years ago in reply to PM

Prodigy 130 points

I have an off-topic question. On the above schematic, is it posssible to set CC2500 to automaticaly set and release PAEN and EN pins on CC2590?

0 PM over 10 years ago in reply to Matjaz Tome

TI__Mastermind 27145 points

Hi,

No, this is not automatic. You need configure the GPIOs as per your requirement.. Please refer to Table 33 in the data sheet for GPIO Signal selection and configuration.

Thanks,

0 Matjaz Tome over 10 years ago in reply to PM

Prodigy 130 points

But I could also cotroll this pins by a microcntroller driving the CC2500 right?

0 PM over 10 years ago in reply to Matjaz Tome

TI__Mastermind 27145 points

Hi,

Yes, You can drive it from MCU.

Thanks,

Other wireless

Other wireless technologies forum

CC2500 matching to CC2590 is a better choice than to use CC2592