Other Parts Discussed in Thread: CC110L,
Hi,
Recently we have moved from TI's CC110L to TI CC1310. But it comes to us at very high cost on firmware size.
Here are the few examples program analysis (from simplelink SDK):
empty_CC1310_LAUNCHXL_tirtos_ccs Dependency - tirtos_builds_CC1310_LAUNCHXL_release_ccs_4_20_01_03 |
name origin length used unused attr fill ---------------------- -------- --------- -------- -------- ---- -------- FLASH 00000000 00020000 00003f92 0001c06e R X SRAM 20000000 00005000 00001e4f 000031b1 RW X |
= 0x3f92 ~ 16274 Bytes (~15.92 KB) |
rfPacketTx_CC1310_LAUNCHXL_tirtos_ccs | name origin length used unused attr fill ---------------------- -------- --------- -------- -------- ---- -------- FLASH 00000000 00020000 00006b32 000194ce R X SRAM 20000000 00005000 000023e2 00002c1e RW X |
0x6b32 ~ 27442 Bytes (~26.69 KB) |
rfPacketTx_CC1310_LAUNCHXL_nortos_ccs | name origin length used unused attr fill ---------------------- -------- --------- -------- -------- ---- -------- FLASH 00000000 00020000 00005d34 0001a2cc R X SRAM 20000000 00005000 00000fc5 0000403b RW X |
0x5d34 ~ 23860 Bytes (~23.30 KB) |
rfPacketRx_CC1310_LAUNCHXL_nortos_ccs | name origin length used unused attr fill ---------------------- -------- --------- -------- -------- ---- -------- FLASH 00000000 00020000 00005d8c 0001a274 R X SRAM 20000000 00005000 00001031 00003fcf RW X |
0x5d8c ~ 23948 Bytes (~23.38 KB) |
rfWakeOnRadioRx_CC1310_LAUNCHXL_tirtos_ccs | name origin length used unused attr fill ---------------------- -------- --------- -------- -------- ---- -------- FLASH 00000000 00020000 0000660a 000199f6 R X SRAM 20000000 00005000 00002896 0000276a RW X |
0x5d8c ~ 26122 Bytes (~25.50 KB) |
Queries
1. The basic empty program itself takes ~16KB of memory. Is this the minimum memory footprint for firmware to run on CC1310 ?
2. The RX/Tx program takes around ~24KB of memory. So to write vendor code for 32KB variant, one has max 8KB available. It looks like basic rtos/nortos code is occupying large portion of code and leaving very less space user space program. Don't we have minimal example set where we can write firmware fo 32KB (with basic tx/rx capability)
3. I am sure many other vendor might be using 32KB variant for Tx/Rx and power management. Wondering how they are managing to fit the firmware in 32KB. Any pointer ? I am really surprise example set is only for 128KB version but 32KB version is overlooked by the team.
4. With CC110L (Along with external controller) we could able to fit entire firmware (along with CC110L lib) in 17KB. I am afraid if 32KB variant of CC1310 provides flexibilty to do so.
Any pointer for tx/rx & power code optimization on TI CC1310 (32KB) will be highly appreciated . We are blocked on this and don't have any clue whether to drop this variant or still have posibility to reduce memory footprint