• State TI Thinks Resolved
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 1 reply
  • Answers 1 answer
  • Subscribers 54 subscribers
  • Views 188 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Support feedback
Options
Options
Related

This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

CC1352P: Difference between code generated by CCS and by Smart RF Studio.

yingtao jia
Expert 1280 points
Part Number: CC1352P

HI, TI.

I use CC1352P, CCS v10.4, my application is based on SimpleLink SDK v5.20 as below:

In syscfg, my radio config is as below:

After project build, CCS generate radio config code in ti_radio_config.c.

And on the other hand, I open Smart RF Studio v2.24.0, double click CC1352P as below

Then, I choose 915MHz, 200kbps, 310.8kHz rx bw parameter as below

I think this set of config is as same as config in CCS syscfg.

Then, I click code export on the right top corner.

Now, I have two code about RF config, one is in ti_radio_config.c generated by CCS syscfg, another is generated by Smart RF Studio, and I think the two RF config should be the same.

I compared the two code, and I found there is only one difference between the two code.

In Smart RF Studio code, pOverrides in radio setup cmd is as below:

In CCS ti_radio_config.c, pOverride in radio setup cmd is as below:

We can find, code in CCS has one more line than code in Smart RF Studio, which is TI_154_STACK_OVERRIDES.

So I want to ask, does the difference has any radio performance impact?