LP-EM-CC1314R10: LP-EM-CC1314R10 problem with SysConfig

Hi Luca, I would suggest you to export the 433 MHz setting for SmartRF Studio 7, if they are present.

If not, it means that this has not been characterized yet.

Regards,

Arthur

Hi Arthur,

the same is with SmartRF Studio 7.

It only sees the physical configuration layer for 868Mhz.

Best Regards,

Luca 

Hi Luca,

Regarding the 433 MHz configuration in SmartRF Studio 7 specifically, this looks to not have been added yet. I may need to find a workaround so you can test it.

Are you using the RGZ (7mm x 7mm) or RSK (8mm x 8mm) package of the CC1314R10?

Regards,

Zack

Hi Zack,

i use the RSK package.

I believe it is a problem given by a new product, and on the reference board (LP-EM-CC1314R10) the antenna match is at 868MHz, so the priority was given to the 868MHz layer.

Best Regards,

Luca

Hi Luca,

Thanks for clarifying; it's correct that a 433 MHz BOM updated for the RSK package has not been released yet.

I'll need to check what the options for this are (regarding both the SmartRF Studio/Sysconfig setup and the 433 MHz BOM for the RSK package) and reply on Thursday.

Regards,

Zack

Hi,

anyone with some news??

Regards,

Luca

Hi Luca,

This has not been forgotten about, but I cannot give a date for when these settings will be finalised.

Please can you specify exactly what your requirements are?

To give some context; due to the number of different possible configurations for this device, the larger the order size the more resources we can devote to a given design and settings. I am trying to see if I can devote some time to develop a preliminary BOM you can use and a starting point for PHY settings, but I cannot commit to a timeline. If you have a specific default PHY that you are interested in, this reduces the scope of the effort and I will be more able to help with this. 

Regards,

Zack

Hi Zack,

attached i have put a image with a PHY that i use now with CC1352.

I think that for my use is a good configuration for start the design.

Thank's.

Regards,

Luca

Hi Luca,

Thank you - I can't give you an exact date for the PHY settings but it will likely not be within the next 2 weeks due to bench availability. If you are okay with reduced testing of the specific PHY you specified, I could share preliminary settings sooner than otherwise (as we would need to test a larger device population over more conditions), but I will not be able to do so this week regardless. The risk is lower than with a new PHY because this PHY has been extensively tested on other CC131x/CC135x devices.

It would not be SysConfig settings, instead I will need to provide exported SmartRF Studio 7 settings for you to use (otherwise it would mean waiting for an SDK update for it to be added) - I will upload them in a reply to this thread. 

Regarding a BOM, I need to check with my manager. The topology and layout will almost certainly be the same as the 4-layer LP-EM-CC1314R10 design, so if you design your board and have the option to update the BOM later, you could submit the design for a layout review in the meantime using:

Sub-1 GHz Design Review Submission: https://www.ti.com/tool/SIMPLELINK-SUB1GHZ-DESIGN-REVIEWS

I will aim to keep this thread unlocked if it does lock unintentionally, but of course please create a new thread if you can't reply to this one.

Regards,

Zack

Hi Zack,

it doesn't matter the timing at the moment, i would prefer to work directly on a PHY layer 
already set up and stable on SysConfig.
I will download the SDK directly when it is ready.
In the meantime, let's finish the development of the 868MHz module.

For the same reason, there is no urgency for the BOM at the moment.
As in this case we could evaluate for the first productions to use a your third-party module, for example RFstar

Maybe when an SDK updated to the new physical layer comes out, send me a message. 

Thank's for your availability


Best Regrds,
Luca