This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

BOOSTXL-CC1120-90: CC1120EM-868-915-RD

Part Number: BOOSTXL-CC1120-90
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: CC1120, CC1190

Tool/software:

Hi all,

I'm working on a project using CC1120 in combination with the CC1190 RF front-end module. I need to both transmit and receive data via RF. To control the front-end:

  • During transmission, I enable PA and disable LNA.
  • During reception, I enable LNA and disable PA.

I control the PA and LNA through external GPIOs (from my MCU, not CC1120 GPIOs).

Issue:

If I switch PA/LNA control logic directly between TX and RX, RF communication does not work reliably. However, if I insert a delay (e.g., 200 ms) between switching from TX to RX (or vice versa), it works properly.

My Question:

Is there any configuration or timing constraint related to CC1120 or CC1190 that I should consider to reduce the switching time between transmission and reception?

Is this delay due to:

  • Settling time in CC1190’s internal circuitry?
  • Timing requirement for RF path stabilization?
  • CC1120 state transition delays?

I would appreciate any suggestions to improve the reliability of TX/RX switching without adding large delays.

Thank you!