• State Resolved
  • Replies 5 replies
  • Answers 1 answer
  • Subscribers 54 subscribers
  • Views 81 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Support feedback
Options
Options
Related

CC1354P10: Support for proprietary 433 MHz band

Alon Levy
Prodigy 70 points
Part Number: CC1354P10
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: CC1352P, CC1352P7, SYSCONFIG

Tool/software:

Hi,

 Does the CC1354P10 support transmitting and receiving on the 433 MHz band?

Thanks,

Alon

  • 0
    TI__Guru* 80991 points

    Hi Alon,

    We don't currently have any characterized settings for the 433 MHz band for CC1354P10.

    As an alternative you can look at the CC1352P or CC1352P7, here we have characterized settings for the 433 MHz band.

    Cheers,

    Marie H

  • 0 in reply to Marie H
    Prodigy 70 points

    Hi Marie!

    Thank you for the reply. Does this mean that the 1354P10 does not support the 433 MHz band or that there are no official performance numbers? if the later, since I already have a board (the LP-EM-CC1354P10-1) I would be happy for any guidance on the required CMD_PROP_RADIO_DIV_SETUP_PA command to set it to this frequency band.

    Alon

  • 0 in reply to Alon Levy
    Prodigy 70 points

    I've managed to transmit, I had to override the sysconfig generated values, I used values produced by smartrf studio 7 setting 433 MHz, and I followed it with the rfCarrier example's FS command and the TX_TEST command, and verified using a TinySA. I used the following overrides to the 868 MHz mode:

    RF_cmdPropRadioDivSetup.centerFreq = 433;
    RF_cmdPropRadioDivSetup.txPower = 0x003F;
    RF_cmdPropRadioDivSetup.loDivider = 0xA;
    pOverrides[0] = TXSUB1_POWER_OVERRIDE(0x003F);

  • 0 in reply to Alon Levy
    TI__Guru* 80991 points

    Hi Alon,

    Yes, the device is fully able to transmit and receive on this band, but since we don't have characterized settings we cannot give any guarantee when it comes to performance.

    Cheers,

    Marie H

  • 0 in reply to Marie H
    Prodigy 70 points

    Hi Marie H,

     Is there any intention to do this characterization?

    Thanks,

    Alon