LAUNCHXL-CC1310: PG 2.0 vs. PG 2.1

Akash Patel

Part Number: LAUNCHXL-CC1310
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: CC1310

Hi team,

We were using the PG 2.0 CC1310 LaunchPad and now have the PG 2.1 CC1310 LaunchPad. We are running the same firmware on the two platforms but in our testing we are having our PG 2.1 board run into error and TX/RX stops in less than 6 hours. However, we were not having any issues when running the same test on our PG 2.0 board.

What are the differences in the silicon PG 2.0 vs. PG 2.1? Are there any register settings that we need to change between the two or an SDK incompatibility?

Regards,

Akash Patel

over 7 years ago

0 TER over 7 years ago

TI__Guru**** 317180 points

All information, including setting differences, are shown in e2e.ti.com/.../551488 and processors.wiki.ti.com/.../CC1310_rev_B_PCN_information

Could you please give more details on what you see and how to reproduce it?

0 Akash Patel over 7 years ago in reply to TER

TI__Expert 6245 points

Hi TER,

We believe our issue was related to the synthesizer calibration failing. We are have implemented the suggestions in Error Handling section of the above linked Wiki and are running some tests right now.

Do we have any plans to release a new revision to remedy the synthesizer calibration issue?

Regards,

Akash

Sub-1 GHz

Sub-1 GHz forum

LAUNCHXL-CC1310: PG 2.0 vs. PG 2.1