This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

CC1350STK: Simplelink wake-on VS BLE in power consumption

Part Number: CC1350STK
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: CC1350

Hi, I have some trouble in measuring the power consumption of CC1350STK(but I will manage to use a DC power analyzer later)

Have u roughly measured the power consumption of RF wake-on( with default parameters)? I want to compare its power consumption with that in BLE to see which is more energy-saving

Thank you in advance

  • Hi Jason, what do you mean by RF wake-on? Do you mean what the consumption is for transmitting a packet? If so I can provide some measurement data for you based on the rfPacketTx example with default Tx power (12.5 dBm), where the device goes from standby to active Tx back to standby...

    Ref.:
    dev.ti.com/.../
  • I am sorry I didnn't express my question very clearly... In Wor, when the device acts as a RF packet receiver(RX), it checks RF signals in the air from time to time. I want to know the power consumption when the device keeps checking RF signal in the air
  • Hi Jason - ok.

    So I did a couple of measurements for you for the rfWakeOnRadioRx example (as is without modifications) for supply voltage VDDS = 3.3V.

    The first one is for the  CC1350 Launchpad.

    I chose to measure this first as these numbers will be close to the performance of the CC1350

    The average current consumption is 33uA:

    Then I measured the CC1350STK. The example as is will lit a LED, so the current consumption will be higher.

    Here I measure 3.4 mA:

    If you modify this example by turning off the LED and other peripherals you should see the same numbers as I got with the Launchpad.