This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
Hi James,
Agree that the RF port impedance is one important parameter in a reference design. This is why we specify it in the documentation. Please refer to the application note: CC13xx/CC26xx Hardware Configuration and PCB Design Considerations: http://www.ti.com.cn/cn/lit/an/swra640b/swra640b.pdf. Chapter 8 contains the optimum load impedance.
However, our recommendation is to still copy the reference design since custom designs that simply match to a conjugate match at a single frequency will not give the best performance. The reference design is based upon simulations, load-pull, load-source and regulatory measurements. If you choose to tweek a design purely based upon simulations then the performance will not be optimized.
0201 components. The main reason for the industry to use this size of passives is mainly due to the directives from major passive suppliers such as Murata that do not recommend many 0402 sized components in new designs. We have used 0402 for many years as a standard size and due to the recommendations from Murata we have switched from 0402 to 0201. From a RF perspective, using 0201 has many advantages compared to 0402.
The CCxxxx reference designs are produced by various TI RF support teams around the world that have RF experience from many different universities/companies; stating that every reference design is produced by non-RF experienced engineers is an interesting and unjust comment.
The reference design is copied by 99 % of customers and this is the quickest way to finalize and optimize the design.
At 433 MHz, the high output power is restricted by national regulations (typically 10 dBm_max). The high power PA port is mostly used for 868/915 MHz and 2.4 GHz.
Which regulations are you targeting to pass ?
Which frequency band and maximum output power do you require ?
Which PHY ?
Regards,
Richard