This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

CC3220MOD: Kindly confirm, CC3220MODSF12MOBR and CC3220MODSF12MOBR are Pin & Firmware Compatible?

Part Number: CC3220MOD
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: CC3235MODSF

Hi,


Kindly confirm, CC3220MODSF12MOBR and CC3220MODSF12MOBR are Pin & Firmware Compatible?

Can we replace CC3220MODSF12MOBR with CC3235MODSF12MOBR without board/design modification right?

CC3220MODSF12MOBR firmware will work on CC3235MODSF12MOBR without any configuration/modification?

 
Thanks and regards,

Naveen K

  • Hi Naveen K,

    The CC3220MODSF and CC3235MODSF are the same pin wise, as seen in Section 7 of their respective datasheets. Although the CC3220MODSF is only for Wi-Fi 2.4 GHz, and the CC3235MOD is dual band (Wi-Fi 2.4 and 5 GHz). As such when using the CC3235MOD in your design the pins 25 and 26 should be grounded, and the RF path should be re-evaluated.  You can find some of our design related resources for the CC3220MOD here, and for the CC3235MOD here and here.

    The firmware for the CC3235Mod would definitely not be the same as the CC3220MOD.

    Best Regards,

    Jessica

  • Hi Jessica,

    Thank you for the information.

    For CC3235MODSF, Pin 25,26 and 29 should be Ground. but for CC3220MODSF Pin 25,26 and 29 are NC. i want to make common board for both.

    So, for CC3220MODSF can we connect Pin 25,26 and 29 to Ground?

    Thanks and regards,

    Naveen K

  • Hi Naveen K,

    The CC3230MOD uses pin 29 for WLAN analog, and pin 25 and 26 for the antenna select, as such I do not recommend connecting these pins to ground.  In general the CC3220MODSF and CC3235MODSF are NOT pin to pin compatible, but they are very similar.

    Best Regards,

    Jessica

  • Hi Jessica,

    Thank you for the information.

    1. Apart from Pin 25,26 and 29 all other pins are pin-pin compatible, right? For Pin 25,26 and 29 we can use/make jumper to connect the pins 25,26,29 to Ground or kept Floating. So that, we can use same board for CC3230MODSF and CC3235MODSF, right?

    2. "RF path should be re-evaluated", Both modules RF pins are same and Impedance will be 50Ohm. Then Why re-evaluation required. Kindly advise.

    Thanks and regards,

    Naveen K

  • Hi Naveen K,

    Yes, in your design adding a jumper would work to set those pins to GND or NC depending on the desired module.  

    The CC3235MODSF has a BW for 2.4GHz - 5.9GHz, as such consider adding a diplexer to use the same antenna for 2.4Ghz and 5Ghz frequency bands.  If you will only use 2.4Ghz, then having an impedance matching of 50ohms is all that is needed. 

    Although if you haven not already done so, verify your board design with the RF Layout Recommendations (Section 10.3.2) in the datasheet and Layout Guidelines .

    Best Regards,

    Jessica M. Torres

  • Hi Jessica,

    Thank you for the information,

    1. For only 2.4GHz, RF design/Layout/schematic will be same for both CC3230MODSF and CC3235MODSF, right?

    2. For 5GHz, Could you please provide the Diplexer schematic, RF Layout design guideline & image, it's not present in the CC3235MODSF datasheet.

    3. We have referred RF Layout recommendation, Trace Width, space, Dielectric are as per the recommendation. I have one doubt. Can we measure the 50 Ohm impedance of the track using multimeter? If yes, what will be the measuring point?

    We have measured From RF Pin to Antenna connector PAD as shown in the image, but we are getting 0.5Ohm for both. Kindly advise the correct method to measure the impedance.

    Thanks and regards,

    Naveen K

  • Hi Naveen,

    1. RF design for CC3220MODSF and CC3235MODSF will be same in case of 2.4GHz will be used only. But I am not aware that modules with CC3230 chip are available at market from TI (you talk about CC3230MODSF).

    2. Diplexer is inside CC3235MOD already and you don't need to use external one.

    3. You cannot measure impedance or antenna by simple multimeter. For measurement you need to use proper RF equipment and you need to have knowledge how use them. Preferred way for tuning of antenna circuits is usage of VNA (vector network analyser). Another option can be usage of bridge method with RF generator, etc.

    At your design is a RF path short. If your RF design is done according TI recommendation, it it likely that you will be fine. But without real measurement you cannot be 100% sure.

    update: this thread and answer from Robert Chen can be useful for you as well.

    Jan