• State Resolved
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 3 replies
  • Subscribers 41 subscribers
  • Views 301 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Support feedback
Options
Options
Related

This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

Original question:

CC3220SF: CC3220sf wifi door lock- Adding new wifi profile

CC3220SF: BLE WiFi Provisioning CC3220SF with CC2652R1F

Avi
Prodigy 130 points
Part Number: CC3220SF
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: CC2640R2F

Hi All,

We have decided to use CC3220SF and CC2652R1F for our project, in our project we would like to implement WiFi Provisioning using BLE. 

I have looked for the examples, I found examples for CC2640R2F using simple_np project with CC3220SF using ble_wifi_provisioning.

1) Is there an example equivalent to simple_np  for CC2652R1F?

2) Is there a guide to port the simple_np project to CC2652R1F?

Thanks

  • 0
    TI__Mastermind 40965 points

    Hi,

    There doesn't seem to be a simple_np equivalent for the CC2652 at the moment.

    There is a porting guide that you can use to port CC2460R2 applications to the CC2652:

    http://dev.ti.com/tirex/explore/node?node=AJoqFs6I99JzMrlF.9iElA__pTTHBmu__LATEST

    I suggest you take a look at that and use that as a guide. That being said, I will double-check on my end and see if there is a reason why the simple_np was not ported in the SDK to begin with. It is possible that there is a technical limitation preventing a simple_np type application from working on the CC2652.

    Regards,

    Michael

  • 0 in reply to Michael Reymond
    Prodigy 130 points

    Hi Michael,

    Thanks for the response. I looked into the porting guide and attempted to migrate the simple_np to CC2652 but there are numerous changes in GAP and GATT in BLE5 stack. We wanted to utilize TI's seamless integration of WiFi + BLE solution to quickly ramp up our product development process but this seems to take a lot of time. 

    Could you please check if there was a reason why simple_np was not ported to BLE5 to begin with? If there is no specific reason, is this on your road map to be ported in the future SDK release?

    Thanks and Regards,

    Avinash 

  • 0 in reply to Avi
    TI__Mastermind 40965 points

    Hi Avinash,

    I checked with the BLE device team, and there isn't a specific reason beyond lack of previous demand. This is not currently on the road map, and I suggest using a CC2640R2 device if you need the simple_np functionality.

    Regards,

    Michael