Dear TI Expert,
We are attempting to improve min Rx sensitivity, but we don't seem to find optimum source impedance data for CC1352P Rx LNA. Could you point out where we can find the optimum souce impedance data for 2.4GHz?
Thanks.
Yuanchen
This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
Dear TI Expert,
We are attempting to improve min Rx sensitivity, but we don't seem to find optimum source impedance data for CC1352P Rx LNA. Could you point out where we can find the optimum souce impedance data for 2.4GHz?
Thanks.
Yuanchen
Yes, we have copied the reference design. And we have a conducted sensitvity of -97~-98dBm or so, whereas in the datasheet typical Rx min sens. value for zigbee(IEEE 802.15.4) is -100 dBm as you know. We want to make a last attempt to improve it a bit.
You mentioned for 2.4GHz(2.405~2.48GHz), Rx sensitivity is quite robust. I take it that the good noise figure circle can easily cover all the freq range. Since we would like to fine tune it a bit, would really appreciate if you can share some advice with us.
and also one more question for understanding, is there any default signal processing of channel estimation or time sync already be involved when using preamble as TI wishes?
Thanks.
Yuanchen
Hi,
The LAUNCHXL-CC1352P-2 values were based upon 0201 passives.
Can you try L13: 1.5 nH and L14: 2nH since these were the values used with 0402 passives ?