This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

LAUNCHXL-CC1352R1: Using Z-Stack Sub 1GHz

Part Number: LAUNCHXL-CC1352R1
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: Z-STACK, SIMPLELINK-CC13X2-26X2-SDK

Hello,

I just read some past posts on E2E about Z-Stack not supporting sub 1GHz.

One example: https://e2e.ti.com/support/wireless-connectivity/sub-1-ghz/f/156/t/765031/

I was under the impression that the underlying IEEE 802.15.4 stack for Zigbee supported sub 1GHz; however, looking around it seems as if only the 2.4GHz implementation can be used for Zigbee.

The product I am currently working on needs sub 1GHz Zigbee communication. Is there any possibility to use the sub 1GHz frequency with Z-Stack? Or is there any other viable alternative provided by TI?

Thank you.

  • For now, Z-Stack still only works on 2.4G and cannot work on subGhz

  • Hello,

    Thank you for your answer. I understand that TI does not officially support Sub GHz for Z-Stack; however, you would not happen to know if there are any resources for circumventing this restriction? I would like to use the IEEE 802.15.4 Sub GHz with Zigbee. Since Z-Stack is already using that stack I figured it would simply be a matter of changing the 15.4 stack.

    If not, I suppose your post answered my original question.

    Regards,

    Felix.

  • It won’t be as easy as just changing to use sub GHz 15.4 stack.

  • Hello Felix,

    You can refer to DSR's ZBOSS solution for Zigbee Sub-1 GHz support with SIMPLELINK-CC13X2-26X2-SDK devices, but this only supports Zigbee Smart Energy 1.4 Specification.  Regarding Zigbee 3.0, TI will officially support Zigbee Sub-1GHz if it is included in the next revision of the Specification announced by the Zigbee Alliance but such a release is not expected until 2021.

    Regards,
    Ryan

  • Hello Ryan,

    Thank you for posting this! ZBOSS looks very promising and seems to cover what we need.

    Though, I would have preferred to stick with Z-Stack since our code base is already using it. I will just have to wait and see if it will be added in the future.

    Regards,

    Felix.