Part Number: DP83867ERGZ-S-EVM Other Parts Discussed in Thread: DP83867IS I am looking to purchase this part but I need to know if it will fit in my enclosure. I cannot fin any information online on the mounting hole pattern. It would be best to have a…
Part Number: DP83867ERGZ-R-EVM Hello team,
I am confused the Resistor value of R652 is 1Mohm. Is this a mistake? ABM3-25.000MHZ-D2Y-T doesn't need such huge resistor.
Best Regards, Kei Kuwahara
Part Number: DP83867ERGZ-R-EVM Connected to XILINX ARTIX7 FPGA
Ran external connections @ 1GbE to Wireshark on laptop. Tx good, Rx nogo
Tried loopback, crossing A - B @ 100MbE, directly connected at RJ45. Tx good, Rx nogo
In both situations, Ethernet…
Part Number: DP83867ERGZ-R-EVM Other Parts Discussed in Thread: MSP430F5529 Dear Team,
1. We would like to use the TDR function of DP83867. Can we use EVB to test TDR function?
Many Thanks.
Jimmy
Part Number: DP83867ERGZ-R-EVM Hello team,
On the user guide, it says GPIO_0 is connected to RJ45 Left (Green).
But on the schematics, GPIO_0 is not connected to LED, and GPIO is not meant for driving LED.
Is GPIO_0 statement should be LED_0? Could…
Part Number: DP83867ERGZ-R-EVM Hello,
I need a letter of volatility for the above part number, if available.
I believe this part does not contain any kind of memory, and as such, would not have a LOV - any confirmation would be appreciated.
Thank you…
Part Number: DP83867ERGZ-R-EVM Hi,
I have a quick question about the DP83867ERGZ-R-EVM board. Here is out test setup. The interface between the Soc Dev Board and DP83867ERGZ-R-EVM is RGMII.
SoC Dev Board ---------- DP83867ERGZ-R-EVM ---------- Router…
Hi Frankie,
Thank you for providing the information so clearly. The Center taps bussed together never works, even without the POE circuitry.
We have a POE reference design board here: https://www.ti.com/tool/TIDA-010083
The schematics and BOM are available…
Hi Rahul,
Franz Forstmayr1 said: The two boards can establish a connection but when running an iperf3 measurement or a netAlly LANBERT measurement I can see packet errors of about 0.01%.
I can establish a connection but see udp packet loss with iperf3…