Part Number: LMK5C33216 Hello,
My customer inquired about the phase noise characteristics of the LMK5C33216.
Could you please share the phase noise characteristics for the 1kHz to 100kHz range for the 245.76MHz output?
Thank you.
Part Number: LMK5C33216 Tool/software: hi
I am using TI LMK5C33216 at my design and looking for more information regarding the phase lock mechanism, i would like understand the following:
1. where can I find more information regarding the phase…
Part Number: LMK5C33216 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: LMK5B33216 , Tool/software: Hi,
We have promoted LMK5B33216 to customer before, now we are considering LMK5C33216 or LMK5C33216A.
I want to know what is the difference between LMK5C33216,LMK5B33216…
Part Number: LMK5C33216 Tool/software: Hi team,
My customer have the following questions related to the TICS pro GUI, please help advise on these.
As for part1 , what’s the decision mechanism of reference LOS? [More questions such as: why was 100…
Part Number: LMK5C33216 Tool/software: Team,
When we using LMK5C33216 we noticed that the TOD accuracy should be up to 7.5ns. Our system design requires ps level TOD accuracy, by any chance is there configuration method to meet ps level TOD accuracy…
Part Number: LMK5C33216 Tool/software: I have a custom board that uses the LMK5C33216 clock synchronizer. I'm trying to send simple commands (generated by TICS Pro) using an Analog Discovery via 4-wire SPI. I want to use a 48MHz XO source and the DPLL1…
Part Number: LMK5C33216 Tool/software: Hi team
good day !
i want to know the difference between these two MPN's ,whether they are full orderable MPN and state their difference
LMK5C33216RGCR
LMK5C33216RGCRR
please provide datasheet and related…
Part Number: LMK5C33216 Tool/software: Hello Support,
I have an LMK5C33216EVM board. Is it possible to replace the LMK5C33216 device with the improved version LMK5C33216A, or are further changes to the eval board necessary ?
Thank you in advance for…
Part Number: LMK5C33216 Hi Team,
When we were doing the LMK5C33126 signal test, we saw that the T6 parameter of the SPI could not meet the requirement. I understand that this is the minimum time for the"sdo read" to send the data after the 33126 receives…