TI E2E support forums
TI E2E support forums
  • User
  • Site
  • Search
  • User
  • E2E™ design support >
  • Forums
    • Amplifiers
    • API solutions
    • Audio
    • Clock & timing
    • Data converters
    • DLP® products
    • Interface
    • Isolation
    • Logic
    • Microcontrollers
    • Motor drivers
    • Power management
    • Processors
    • RF & microwave
    • Sensors
    • Site support
    • Switches & multiplexers
    • Tools
    • Wireless connectivity
    • Archived forums
    • Archived groups
  • Technical articles
  • TI training
    • Tech days
    • Online training
    • Live events
    • Power Supply Design Seminar
  • Getting started
  • 简体中文
  • More
  • Cancel


Search tips
Showing 24 results View by: Thread Post Sort by
    Answered
  • OPA2205: MULTIPLE AMPLIFIERS CHANNEL SEPARATION

    Hiroaki Yuyama TED
    Hiroaki Yuyama TED
    Resolved
    Part Number: OPA2205 Dear, support team. Do you have the MULTIPLE AMPLIFIERS CHANNEL SEPARATION spec of OPA2205 ? We are proposing to replace our ADI OP2177 to our customer and we are making a comparison table of specifications. The channel separation…
    • Resolved
    • over 5 years ago
    • Amplifiers
    • Amplifiers forum
  • Answered
  • OPA2205: Input bias current, input offset current and super-beta inputs

    Phong Phan
    Phong Phan
    Resolved
    Part Number: OPA2205 Hello everyone, I have some questions regarding the OP2205 op amp model to clarify my understanding of the op amp principle. 1. Does this model use Voltage FB or Current FB architecture? I'm having trouble understanding the…
    • Resolved
    • over 5 years ago
    • Amplifiers
    • Amplifiers forum
  • LT1013: output state after IC failure?

    AnBer
    AnBer
    TI Thinks Resolved
    Part Number: LT1013 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: OPA2205 , OPA2197-Q1 Team, In case LT1013 or OPA2205 input gets damaged (EOS, or any other type of failure..etc) are we able to say if IC will always present a given known output state? Do we have some…
    • over 1 year ago
    • Amplifiers
    • Amplifiers forum
  • OPA2277: Replacement recommendation

    Zoey Wu
    Zoey Wu
    TI Thinks Resolved
    Part Number: OPA2277 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: OPA2205 , OPA2206 , OPA2196 Tool/software: Hi team, my customer is using SGMOP17C-2 and I recommend OPA2277 to replace. do u have better recommendations? Could u kindly help to make some comparisons…
    • over 1 year ago
    • Amplifiers
    • Amplifiers forum
  • OPA2180: Does TI have compar table OPA2180 and OP2177?

    Jimmy WANG
    Jimmy WANG
    Part Number: OPA2180 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: OPA2205 , OPA2188 Hi team, Could you suggest a solution to replace OP2177? same or better spec and pricing under $1. I use cross reference. the result is below. If OPA2180 is okay. Do you have…
    • over 1 year ago
    • Amplifiers
    • Amplifiers forum
  • Answered
  • RE: OPA4209: Measurement Variation with the OPA4209.

    Raymond Zhang1
    Raymond Zhang1
    Resolved
    Hi Felipe, It may be able to use OPA205 or OPA2205 or OPA4205 or even the initial OPA4209 part. The issues are your input voltage is too small and you do not have gains in the test circuit. If you have gain of 200 initially per your test configuration…
    • 11 months ago
    • Amplifiers
    • Amplifiers forum
  • OPA2188: Noise reduction in howland current source

    savi saj
    savi saj
    TI Thinks Resolved
    Part Number: OPA2188 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: OPA2191 , OPA2192 , OPA2205 , OPA2182 Hi, i am using the part opa2188 opamp for designing a howland current source. After testing current source circuit, noise is above limits. Since we need to…
    • over 3 years ago
    • Amplifiers
    • Amplifiers forum
  • Answered
  • OPA627: noise simulation question in section 8.6 of Precision Lab video

    BX27
    BX27
    Resolved
    Part Number: OPA627 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: OPA2205 , OPA192 Hi there, When watching this 8.6 video, it mentions at 5:44: In this example the current noise source does not have a 1/f region. So set the 1/f noise the same as the broadband noise…
    • Resolved
    • over 4 years ago
    • Amplifiers
    • Amplifiers forum
  • RE: INA849: if the output noise of INA849 is good for me

    Raymond Zhang1
    Raymond Zhang1
    Hi Nan, I only want to have a good DC output. Thanks for Kai's noise analysis and estimation! I normally would not recommend to build one's own instrumentation or difference amplifiers for an application. The reasons are that the resistors inside…
    • over 3 years ago
    • Amplifiers
    • Amplifiers forum
  • Answered
  • RE: LM101AJAN: Looking for an automotive grade replacement for LM108

    kai klaas69
    kai klaas69
    Resolved
    Hi Thomas, the LM108 uses unique compensation techniques. As far as I know there's no TI's direct replacement. sboa305.pdf Kai
    • over 3 years ago
    • Amplifiers
    • Amplifiers forum
<>

Didn't find what you are looking for? Post a new question.

  • Ask a new question