Part Number: OPA2237 OPA2234UA Op Amp Dual Low Offset Voltage Amplifier ±18V/36V 8-Pin SOIC Tube has been obsoleted since May 2020.
What is the manufacturer's recommended replacment that most closely matches electrically and is in the same SOIC package…
Part Number: OPA2237 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TINA-TI , PTN78060W , TPSM63603 Hi I came across below op amp circuit . Would like to understand and need to verify this circuit is correct ?
Part Number: OPA2237 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: OPA2330 , OPA2333 Hello team,
Do we have a graph for Offset voltage vs Common-Mode Voltage of OPA2237?
If you also have OPA2330 and OPA2333 graph, please share it with me.
Best regards,
Sh…
When driven in an open-loop configuration, all op amps will be pushed against one of its rails. The only time I may think of a potential problem is when the input voltage violates the specified input common-mode voltage range and the op amps suffers from…
Part Number: OPA2237 Hi,
My customer is considering using this OPA2237EA Opamp. He is checking on the parameters and cannot find the supply current in OPA2237 datasheet.
Does TI have this data ready ?
.
Regards,
CM.
Part Number: OPA2237 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: OPA2180-Q1 , OPA2197-Q1 Hi expert,
We are finding Q-grade OPA for current sensing, customer is satisfied with OPA2237 but it doesn't have Q version. May I know if you have "close" one with Q-grade…
Dear Yuyama-san,
General information on SO package type dimensions can be found here:
http://www.ti.com/packaging/docs/searchtipackages.tsp?packageName=SO
In this list, you can select D8 package, and the link will open a new window displaying…
Part Number: OPA2237 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TLC27L2 , TLC27L1 , TLV27L1 Hello,
I am looking for a General purpose opamp with with input common mode voltage extending below ground or negative supply.
Following are brief requirements:
1…
Hi Paul,
Thank you for your response.
We can definitely increase the values of the divider resistors. Would you mind clarifying what you mean by "...which will then clamp earlier."?
FYI, this particular LM393 comparator circuit doesn't encounter…