TI E2E support forums
TI E2E support forums
  • User
  • Site
  • Search
  • User
  • E2E™ design support >
  • Forums
    • Amplifiers
    • Audio
    • Clock & timing
    • Data converters
    • DLP® products
    • Enterprise Automation Integration
    • Interface
    • Isolation
    • Logic
    • Microcontrollers
    • Motor drivers
    • Power management
    • Processors
    • RF & microwave
    • Sensors
    • Site support
    • Switches & multiplexers
    • Tools
    • Wireless connectivity
    • Archived forums
    • Archived groups
  • Technical articles
    • Analog
    • Automotive
    • DLP® technology
    • Embedded processing
    • Industrial
    • Power management
  • TI training
    • Tech days
    • Online training
    • Live events
    • Power Supply Design Seminar
  • Getting started
  • 简体中文
  • More
  • Cancel


Search tips
Showing 27 results View by: Thread Post Sort by
    Answered
  • OPA683: OPA683 versus OPA684 input offset voltage in TINA models

    Chris Roden
    Chris Roden
    Resolved
    Part Number: OPA683 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: OPA684 I have been doing some TINA spice simulations with both the OPA683 and OPA684. The non-inverting input is connected to ground, and the inverting input is connected to a small signal input and…
    • Resolved
    • over 4 years ago
    • Amplifiers
    • Amplifiers forum
  • Answered
  • OPA684: Voh and Vol for the \DISABLE pin using those supply voltages ( +/- 3.3V)

    Cary Smith
    Cary Smith
    Resolved
    Part Number: OPA684 I am using the OPA684 with Vs= +3.3V and Vs- = -3.3V . I cannot find the Voh and Vol for the \DISABLE pin using those supply voltages.
    • Resolved
    • over 4 years ago
    • Amplifiers
    • Amplifiers forum
  • Answered
  • RE: OPA691: OPA691: Optimum value of the feedback resistance for ±3.3V supply rail.

    Michael Steffes
    Michael Steffes
    Resolved
    I had some previous sim files already set up, here is the OPA684 at gain of 10, Rf=900ohms - the models generally do not try to include much in the way of supply variation on AC results, I put it to +/-3.3V supplies for this app, but +/-5V would look…
    • over 1 year ago
    • Amplifiers
    • Amplifiers forum
  • Answered
  • RE: THS3001: Correct configuration for DAC output

    Michael Steffes
    Michael Steffes
    Resolved
    Well Joaquin, number of issues here, 1. These comms DAC's are always complementary current output - they are steering a tail current (2mA) between two ouptuts - so you need to model that. 2. Normally, you want to use both output currents to get the…
    • over 1 year ago
    • Amplifiers
    • Amplifiers forum
  • RE: OPA838: RF – Small Signal Low Noise Amplification and Demodulation

    Michael Steffes
    Michael Steffes
    Morning Ryan, You sure have a lot going on here, without getting too deep into it couple of observations 1. Your high gain cascaded stages are broadband when you say you have a noisy environment - are you sure you don't want to do a little bit of bandlimiting…
    • over 1 year ago
    • Amplifiers
    • Amplifiers forum
  • Answered
  • RE: THS3491: Zol test and parasitic capacitance of noninverting terminal questions

    Owen Yan
    Owen Yan
    Resolved
    Hi Michael, I followed your method in the article to build this circuit: The Ri and L are calculated to be 4.2ohms and 73.9nH which is similar to yours. But as you can see in the next curves: PM=45.76° fxover=27.88MHz which is said to be 43Mhz in…
    • over 2 years ago
    • Amplifiers
    • Amplifiers forum
  • RE: THS4631: Closed loop Gain stability at 1MHz

    Michael Steffes
    Michael Steffes
    But by way of preview Tatarao, Your gain error at higher gains and 1MHz is just the response rolling off as it should. If you want better flatness through 1MHz and gain of 100, use a faster VFA or a CFA device like the OPA684.
    • over 2 years ago
    • Amplifiers
    • Amplifiers forum
  • Answered
  • Analog Engineer's Circuit: Amplifiers-----Inverting summer circuit

    hua liao
    hua liao
    Resolved
    Other Parts Discussed in Thread: OPA683 , OPA684 hello: when i go through the pdf document of Analog Engineer's Circuit: Amplifiers, i can see the descrpition as below: can you explain why the first formula is 2.5V-(-2.5V), but the second formula…
    • Resolved
    • over 2 years ago
    • Amplifiers
    • Amplifiers forum
  • Answered
  • OPA695: Die difference

    FRANK1
    FRANK1
    Resolved
    Part Number: OPA695 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: OPA684 Hi team, A customer want to confirm the difference of CLC401A and CLC401. can you help me to clarify it? Thanks. Regards,
    • Resolved
    • over 3 years ago
    • Amplifiers
    • Amplifiers forum
  • RE: WEBENCH® Tools/LM7171: LM7171

    Michael Steffes
    Michael Steffes
    I attached a TINA file with the op amp models in them. You only require 68V/usec slew rate, and a gain of 20V/V, look at the OPA684 for a +/-5V low power solution.
    • over 3 years ago
    • Amplifiers
    • Amplifiers forum
>

Didn't find what you are looking for? Post a new question.

  • Ask a new question
About TI
Company News & events Investor relations Corporate citizenship Careers Contact us
Quick links
TI E2E™ design support forums Customer support center Packaging Quality & reliability TI university program myTI FAQ
Buying
Ordering resources Ordering help & FAQs BOM & cross reference tool Quick add to cart Authorized distributors
Connect with us

Texas Instruments has been making progress possible for decades. We are a global semiconductor company that designs, manufactures, tests and sells analog and embedded processing chips. Our products help our customers efficiently manage power, accurately sense and transmit data and provide the core control or processing in their designs.

Cookie policy Privacy policy Terms of sale Terms of use Trademarks Website feedback

© Copyright 1995-2023 Texas Instruments Incorporated. All rights reserved.