Part Number: SN74LVTH16244A Other Parts Discussed in Thread: SN74LVT16244B Hi team,
My customer is using the device SN74LVTH16244ADGG now. But the input Tr/Tf：113us/V， but the datasheet can only accept Tr/Tf：Max 10ns/V. Do we have some methods to do…
Part Number: SN74LVTH16244A Hi Team,
My customer are evaluating the SN74LVTH16244 and he want to know if there is some limitations in the specs showed in datasheet.
For the tw,tsu and th in the datasheet, what's the limitation for this time?
…
Part Number: SN74LVTH16244A Hi, team,
I met one issue in my customer side. They have two boards with SN74LVTH16244A on board with similar design and layout. If they disconnect SN74LVTH16244A input pin connection, they can find devices output on one…
Part Number: SN74LVTH16244A Dear Team,
Can you please advise for SN74LVTH16244ADGVR abs max. rating for the junction temp?
Do you have a graph for MTBF vs. junction temp?
Best regards,
Nir
Part Number: SN74LVTH16244A Hi, team,
I have one question about SN74LVTH16244A Input transition rise or fall rate.
In datasheet, the input transition rise or fall rate is 10ns/V maximum as shown below. But in customer's test, the result is 3.36us…
Part Number: SN74LVTH16244A Tool/software: Dear Sir/Mam Kindly give the grade details(automotive/Industrial/commercial), EOL , FIT Rate with respect to CL=95% , Temp=55 deg C for the above mentioned part number.
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: SN74LVTH16244A HI Team,
Can you help with Pin to Pin replacement for our Obsolete device - SN74LVTH32244ZKER
If not p2p, any solution to replace this socket
Hi Vera,
The SN74LVT16244(B) does not have any internal pull-up or pull-down resistors.
We do have the SN74LVTH16244A that contains bus-hold circuitry on the inputs to avoid floating inputs, but I don't know of a similar device with pull-down resistors…
The current part numbers we sell are SN74LVTH162244 and SN74LVTH16244a. Both devices also have the bus-hold feature on them, so the bus lines never float. This allows you to not need pull-up resistors on your bus lines.
You are correct: of the two devices…
