• TLV9154: TLV9154IPWR

  

  Parameswaran Sakthivel

  TI Thinks Resolved

  Part Number: TLV9154 Tool/software: As per IPC/JEDEC J-STD-033D , Baking conditions are not required for below part for MSL = 2 and thickness = 1.2 mm for the MPN TLV9154IPWR. Kindly confirm whether we can consider baking is not required for that part…

  • 2 months ago
  • Amplifiers
  • Amplifiers forum

• TLV9154: TLV9154IPWR

  

  Parameswaran Sakthivel

  TI Thinks Resolved

  Part Number: TLV9154 Tool/software: Please provide the Baking conditions for TLV9154IPWR

  • 2 months ago
  • Amplifiers
  • Amplifiers forum
Answered

• TLV9154: Need COD information // GEC

  

  Kishor Yelwe

  Resolved

  Part Number: TLV9154 Hello dear, pls help to provide the COD/CCO for below. PItemCode MPN Country of origin Country of diffusion GEC1H-TLV9154IPWR TLV9154IPWR GEC1H-5976200 DAC60504BRTER

  • Resolved

  • 1 month ago
  • Amplifiers
  • Amplifiers forum
Answered

• TLV9154: Nonlinear Distortion Problem

  

  sberegov

  Resolved

  Part Number: TLV9154 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TL072H , TLV9164 , OPA4197 Tool/software: Hello, I'm using this op amp as an analog front-end (unity gain) buffer and it works according to spec for frequencies less than a few kHz. Above 10-15…

  • Resolved

  • 6 months ago
  • Amplifiers
  • Amplifiers forum
Answered

• TLV9154-Q1: Temp dependency

  

  Kazuki Kuramochi

  Resolved

  Part Number: TLV9154-Q1 Tool/software: Hello Expert, Does TLV9154-Q1's PSPICE model simulate performance temperature dependency? Best regards, Kazuki Kuramochi

  • Resolved

  • 9 months ago
  • Amplifiers
  • Amplifiers forum
Answered

• TLV9154-Q1: EMIRR vs single power supply

  

  Kazuki Kuramochi

  Resolved

  Part Number: TLV9154-Q1 Tool/software: Hello Expert, The EMIRR performance measurement condition is dual power supply. Then, is there any impact for EMIRR performance when they use this device under single power supply(+=8V, -=0V)? Best regards…

  • Resolved

  • 7 months ago
  • Amplifiers
  • Amplifiers forum
Answered

• TLV9154-Q1: The reason of why PSRR is defined as "±"

  

  Kazuki Kuramochi

  Resolved

  Part Number: TLV9154-Q1 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: OPA209 Tool/software: Hello Expert, Could you please tell me why this device's PSRR defined as "±"? I suppose that the definition of PSRR is ΔVDD(+/-)/ΔVos. So ΔVDD and ΔVos have possibility…

  • Resolved

  • 7 months ago
  • Amplifiers
  • Amplifiers forum

• TLV9154-Q1: Is it MUX friendly device?

  

  Yoshiki Ochi

  TI Thinks Resolved

  Part Number: TLV9154-Q1 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: OPA2171-Q1 Hi team, Is it MUX friendly device? Could we use it as comparator on open-loop? https://www.ti.com/product/TLV9154-Q1 "Product details"says "MUX friendly" but its datasheet does not…

  • over 2 years ago
  • Amplifiers
  • Amplifiers forum

• TLV9154: EMIRR parameters of TLV9154 and TLV4171

  

  Amy Luo

  TI Thinks Resolved

  Part Number: TLV9154 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TLV4171 Hi team, For the EMIRR of TLV9154 and TLV4171, in addition to the EMIRR IN+ vs Frequency curve in the datasheet, can you also provide the EMIRR test data of other pins of TLV9154 and TLV4171…

  • over 4 years ago
  • Amplifiers
  • Amplifiers forum
Answered

• TLV9154: Inconsistency in TLV9154/TLV9152/TLV9151 datasheet regarding EMIRR

  

  AndyP

  Resolved

  Part Number: TLV9154 Hi, in the latest (rev.D) datasheet of TLV915x there is some inconsistency in regards to EMIRR - there are two plots of EMIRR vs frequency and they differ significantly. One is Fig. 6-41 and the other Fig. 7-1. There are differences…

  • Resolved

  • over 4 years ago
  • Amplifiers
  • Amplifiers forum

Didn't find what you are looking for? Post a new question.