Part Number: TLV9301 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TL431 ,
Hi TI experts,
I am working on a CV dummy load simulation with TLV9301 driving a MOSFET. As you could see from this TINA simulation result, during the load transient it looks like the inverting…
Part Number: TLV9301 Why does the SC70 (DCK) package have an MSL rating of 2, while the larger SOT-23 (DBV) package has a rating of 1? I assume the chip is identical inside of the package, so it must have to do with the packaging. But why are there many…
Part Number: TLV9301 Hi,
the datasheet showed the Vcc value was 4.5V, wheather the device work as usual when Vcc value is lower（4v） than the datasheet show?
and i want to know what is the influence if i give the device lower Vcc value(4V) .
Part Number: TLV9301 Hi Amplifier Team,
I am currently looking at TLV930x and TLV910x. I understand that TLV930x is a RRO while TLV910x is a RRIO.
But it seem like in both their datasheet, it does not have any information about the input swing range…
Part Number: TLV9301 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: OPA1678 , The part is *not* listed as a rail-to-rail input and the stated input common mode voltage range is listed as extending to (V+) - 2V in section 6.7. Electrical Specs.
However, the block diagram…
Part Number: TLV9301 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TLV9351 , LM10 , LM10QML Hello,
I have a customer that is looking to implement ±15V rails that track each other at power up and power down from a 24V rail. I wanted to check if an inverting amplifier…
Part Number: TLV9301 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TLE2426 , TLV930x looks like a nice candidate as a rail-splitter as it seems to have relatively high output current.
Any issues using it as a rail-splitter?
Similar performance can be seen in application note Design Guidelines for Devices with LM324/LM358 Cores figure 3.2
Why not use the recommended replacement device TLV9301 ; this device has more charts.
0,0 on figure 4 looks low to me.