Hi Sandeep,
the schematics look good.
M SANDEEP said: 3) And here i am using the TLV9304 for Quad channel purpose. In future if stock is not available for this component, i am suggesting the alternate part numbers to customer are TLV4172 or OPA4191 . Are…
Part Number: TLV9304 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: OPA4990 Hi team,
My customer will evaluate any samples of TLV9304IPWR or OPA4990IPWR for adopted in new models..
TLV9304IPWR and OPA4990IPWR are status under development on the Website.
Please let…
Part Number: TLV9304 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: DAC60096 , DAC43608 , TLV9302 , , TINA-TI Hi Team,
My customer would like to proceed with TLV9302/4 with DAC60096 or DAC43608.
See below:
1. DAC60096 – The output signal of DAC60096 is (-10.5v) – (+10…
In analog applications journal slyt613 it is said "The Q of the notch is dependent on the gain of the amplifiers as opposed to component matching." I guess OL gain. How this is possible? Does TLV9304 fit our requirement?
1.83 V × 9 = 16.47 V. But the LM224A does not have rail-to-rail outputs; the V OH specification shows that even a small output current requires a headroom of 1.5 V to the positive supply.
You could change the amplification factor so that the output…
Hi Brian,
Kai is correct. C143 and C178 MUST be removed. Having a capacitor directly on the output of the amplifier provides no benefit. If the intention of the capacitor is to provide filtering, you must add a resistor.
It is possible that the On-semi…
Jo,
The voltage needed is temperature dependent because a diode forward bias voltage varies with temperature. Any data I gathered would be sample data so there would be no process wide values.
I see just three options.
1) Check for proper layout to minimise…
Hi Sean,
I recommend taking a look at the TLV9304 or OPA4990. The TLV9304 is a very close in performance to the MC33174. The OPA4990 is higher performance and Rail to Rail input compared to the MC33174.
If higher bandwidth is needed please take a look…