Hi Frank,
Thank you for reaching out and definitely we can support. Could you please give me some details on the use case and how you chose the TMUX6208.
- What is the required signal voltage?
- What are the available supply voltage rails?
- How…
Part Number: TMUX6208 Hi Team,
In our customer's application, they will switch CAN bus and K-Line between different channels. He would like to know if TMUX6208 and MUX36xxx would be fast enough to switch these digital signals. The CAN is up to 5 MBPS…
Part Number: TMUX6209 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TMUX6208 Hello!
Datasheet for TMUX6209 (Available both from https://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/tmux6208.pdf and https://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/tmux6209.pdf ) states that logic pins have 4M pull…
Part Number: OPA145 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TMUX6208 , OPA140 Hi,
We have a circuit consisting of a OPAMP (OPA145) and AMUX (TMUX6208). The input of the OPAMP is connected to a mother-board test point. When there is no voltage from the mother…
Hi Jade,
The best 8:1 muxes that can operate at 125C and take 5V power would either be TMUX1108 , which has a 66mA max continuous current or TMUX6208 , which has a 99mA continuous current max for the RUM package when powered with 5V at 125C.
The best…
Part Number: CD4051B Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TMUX7208 , TMUX6208 Hello everyone,
We are using the CD4051BPWR for multiplexing signals of +-3, +-6 and +-9 V, we've checked this values arrive to their respective pins.
The supply voltages…
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TMUX7208 , TMUX6208 , MUX506 , MUX507 Hi Tier,
I am looking for a dual channels 16:1 mux that is similar to DG407DYZ, if possible, we would like to have higher spike voltage than DG407DYZ.
Does TI have a MUX solution…
Hey Andrew, We don't have any 5:1 multiplexers. Your best bet would be a 8:1 multiplexer. It would still use the same amount of select pins and we have 8:1 devices that are still minimal in size so having the 3 extra channels won't be too impactful. In…
Hi Jonathan,
Thank you for reaching out.
The functional use of the 8:1 Mux to sample the 8 input signals one at a time looks good as it will save lot of component space/cost. They need to account for the switch RON/RDSon resistance in the calculation…
