Part Number: TPS3850 Tool/software: i am using this circuit to monitor the window of , is the design calculation ok? But i have one doubt if i am monitoring 3.3V & both VDD & sense pins are connected to the same, the circuit will be wrong right? If the…
Part Number: TPS3850 Tool/software: Hi, team,
Is [1.05] in equation (15) in the datasheet the correct value? If this value is taken from Table8-5, I assume that [1.095] is the correct value, but am I wrong?
Best regards,
Sato.
Part Number: TPS3850 Tool/software: Hello,
I need to know if TPS3850 is ASIL and can be used for safety applications? if yes can you provide me with safety manual?
Part Number: TPS3850 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: , TMS320F2800157 Tool/software: In a previous thread , I inquired about the ASIL rating of the TPS3850, and the response was as follows: "The TPS3850-Q1 is not an ASIL rated device. However, we do…
Part Number: TPS3850-Q1 Tool/software: Dear Team,
As discussed earlier regarding the MCU continuously resetting, based on Texas Instruments recommendation and our analysis, we understood that the previously selected IC (TPS3850G09QDRCRQ1) was not suitable…
Part Number: TPS3850-Q1 Tool/software: Hi Teams,
Please kindly help to review the sch. And help to check the below questions.
1, We are expecting to have 132ms upper threshold (pic1) with 1nf CWD & CRST 4.7nF. But found the WDO reset asserted when…
Part Number: TPS3850-Q1 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TPS3850 , Hi TI expert
Can you provide your proposals regarding the CCF analysis between voltage monitoring and WWD under the fact that no DFA is available from TI side.
We must demonstrate…
Part Number: TPS3850-Q1 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TPS3850
Hi team,
For watch dog IC TPS3850, it shows that the IC failure rate is 25 feet, but for Functional safety requirements, it should be under 10 feet, so does the 25 feet of failure rate…
Part Number: TPS3850 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TPS3436-Q1 , TPS36-Q1 , TPS35 , TPS3435 Tool/software: Hi Team,
In below configuration of the schematic, the WDO should be kept LOW while WDI is LOW, correct? Is this waveform operation normally…