Hello,
yes, I am using the TMDSCNCD28388D .
yes, I am changing the word size through the defines at the top of the example.
In example, you are missing delay between sending and receiving of two words. It should be:
1) send 2 words
2) delay…
Part Number: TMS320F28388D Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TMDSCNCD28388D , C2000WARE Tool/software: TI C/C++ Compiler Eval board: F28388D controlCARD (TMDSCNCD28388D)
Running control algorithm CLA1 and using GPIO28 to confirm CLA task 1 is executing…
Part Number: TMS320F28388D Other Parts Discussed in Thread: C2000WARE Tool/software: Code Composer Studio Hello!!!
we have purchased the following set of development boards: 1. HSEC180 controlCARD Baseboard Docking Station www.ti.com/.../TMDSHSECDOCK…
Part Number: TMS320F28388D Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TRF7970A , MSP430G2553 I'm attempting to integrate the TRF7970A Boosterpack ( http://www.ti.com/tool/DLP-7970ABP ) with the F28388D controlCARD ( http://www.ti.com/tool/TMDSCNCD28388D ). In order…
Hi Siddharth,
Any updates?
Also I have an update here:
I'm able to send data using from Host PC over TCP to Server(F28388).
But I'm stuck with sending back data to the Client (Host PC) which is received over IPC from CPU1 over TCP.
I think I…
Part Number: TMS320F28388D Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TMDSCNCD28388D , AMC1304M25 , , TIPD165 Hi expert,
I have F28388D evaluation board( TMDSCNCD28388D )
And I tried to use sample application ( https://www.ti.com/tool/TIPD165)
However I can…
Part Number: TMS320F28388D Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TMDSCNCD28388D
Purchased TI’s 28388D main chip.
With reference to the schematic design of TMDSCNCD28388D, I designed a circuit board by myself.
From June to December this year, the board…
I wouldn't say it is better with one vs. the other.
In general the C2000 CPU is 50% - 100% more effective MHz than Arm M4F for these type of control loops, but the Arm devices are often running at 50-100% higher clock rates so it effectively evens outs…
