This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

DP83867E: Strap Configuration Status Register (0x6e) reset?

Part Number: DP83867E

Hello There,

I wonder if it's normal for DP83867E that register 0x6e resets after POR, as I found multiple e2e thread observed 0x6e = 0 and I'm also observing this case on my customer's board.

0x6e = 0

https://e2e.ti.com/support/interface-group/interface/f/interface-forum/904509/dp83867e-dp83867-sgmii-no-link/3346035?tisearch=e2e-sitesearch&keymatch=dp83867e%25252525200x6e#3346035

0x6e = 0000

https://e2e.ti.com/support/interface-group/interface/f/interface-forum/1026004/dp83867e-dp83867e-ping-failure-at-1500-bytes-length/3818630?tisearch=e2e-sitesearch&keymatch=dp83867e#3818630

Per TI Precision lab, each strap pin is connected as an input during the POR and then connected as GPIO output during normal operation. Does the buffer connection during the normal operation reset the register 0x6e?

Thank you for your clarification in advance.

  • Hi Ella,

    Upon every hardware reset, the strap register should re-load the values based on what is observed from the straps. For example, if a hardware change is made to the bootstrap registers during normal operation, and then the PHY is reset, you may see a change in register 0x6e reflecting the hardware change to the bootstraps (though as you can imagine, this method of hardware change during normal operation is not recommended). 

    I have the following questions:

    • Can you kindly share a schematic for review?
    • Do the strap resistors for the desired modes match the recommended values?
    • What is the voltage on each strap pin during the strap latch-in period? Does it match the expected voltage for the desired strap mode?
    • Is there a connected device on the strap pins that could possibly be pulling them low?

    Thank you,

    Nikhil

    All information in this correspondence and in any related correspondence is provided “as is” and “with all faults”, and it is subject to TI’s Important Notice (http://www.ti.com/corp/docs/legal/important-notice.shtml).

  • Hi Ella,

    Are you still experiencing this issue? Do you have any feedback for my questions above?

    Thank you,

    Nikhil

    All information in this correspondence and in any related correspondence is provided “as is” and “with all faults”, and it is subject to TI’s Important Notice (http://www.ti.com/corp/docs/legal/important-notice.shtml).

  • Hi Nikhil Menon, I cannot send you a private message, I can only reply to you here, please help me solve the podl

  • Hi Zeshan,

    I have sent you a private message. Please let me know if you do not see the message.

    Thank you,

    Nikhil

    All information in this correspondence and in any related correspondence is provided “as is” and “with all faults”, and it is subject to TI’s Important Notice (http://www.ti.com/corp/docs/legal/important-notice.shtml).

  • Hi Nikhil, 

    Thank you for your follow-up. For your question 1 and 2, I provided schematics thru the email and we discussed enough to get a conclusion that the schematic has no issue. For your question 4, strap pins are directly pulled up to LDO power supply without other devices. 

    I asked customer to check strap pin voltage and register values (0x0, 0x1, 0x10, 0x11, 0x14, 0x31, 0x32, 0x37, 0x6e) for debugging but I haven't heard any feedback yet. Maybe you can close this thread and I can ask for your help again thru email once I get feedback from customer.

  • Hi Ella,

    Thanks for the confirmation. Let's continue via email once we receive customer feedback and I will close this thread, per your suggestion.

    Thank you,

    Nikhil

    All information in this correspondence and in any related correspondence is provided “as is” and “with all faults”, and it is subject to TI’s Important Notice (http://www.ti.com/corp/docs/legal/important-notice.shtml).