Other Parts Discussed in Thread: DP83869
Hi Team,
There is a good new that we could DIN TI product
And there have one thing need your support,
Please help suggest solution, THX
Spec:
1000BASE-T1 PHY
|
This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
Hi Team,
There is a good new that we could DIN TI product
And there have one thing need your support,
Please help suggest solution, THX
Spec:
1000BASE-T1 PHY
|
Thank you for the query.
You already listed the part in the Thread. Can i understand what support you are looking for.
DP83TG720S-Q1 1000BASE-T1 Automotive Ethernet PHY
Regards,
Sreenivasa
After discuss with customer
They need chip must support 4-core POE,
DP83TG720S-Q1 seem unmet spec , could you please help suggest a new solution ,THX
Thank you for the input.
When you mean 4-core did you mean GBE with four pairs?
Regards,
Sreenivasa
Thank you for the inputs.
I am not able to understand the block diagram.
If you are looking for GBE solutions we have the DP83867 for copper only and DP83869 for copper or fiber.
Regards,
Sreenivasa
Thank you
1. If the part of the Ethernet port, customer needs to configure the POE mode, whether there is a related reference SCH?
2.There is a deference for the pin sequence defined in Figure A/Figure B below. Which one should correct?
,
3.As shown on page P115 below, it is mentioned that the DC Blocking capacitor is a 1% accuracy material. Is the requirement too high? Could 10% be used? (BTW. Serdes Coupling Cap. 0.1uf/10%)
Thank you for the queries.
Let me check and update you early next week.
Regards,
Sreenivasa
We do not have a reference schematics for POE.
Please orient the pins in the same direction and both will look same.
For the tolerance, the 1% is typically for the resistors. Please refer the EVM for more details.
Regards,
Sreenivasa
Please let me know if you have any additional questions. If not, Please click the resolved button to close the thread.
Regards,
Sreenivasa