Hi team,
My customer found that the TCAN4550 could not receive and send data when the customer heat the IC, with surface at 50℃. When cooling down about 40℃,after power on again, the chip worked normally . And I find that the case, TCAN4550 :Crystal and capacitor (https://e2e.ti.com/support/interface-group/interface/f/interface-forum/1126090/tcan4550-crystal-and-capacitor-problem/4202361?tisearch=e2e-sitesearch&keymatch=tcan4550#4202361 ) , is similar with the case my customer met.
After reading the case in e2e, I get questions below:
Q1. As e2e said"The communication issues come from the TCAN4550's single-ended clock detection comparator which is monitoring the OSC2 pin for a "grounded" pin or a voltage less than approximately 100mV. The actual threshold could vary between 90mV and 150mV, but it is typically around 100mV(90-150mV). If the voltage on the OSC2 pin crosses this threshold, then the comparator will disable the crystal oscillator amplifier and switch the device to single-ended detection mode where it expects a clock to be applied to the OSC1 pin.", I get to know that OSC2 voltage should be under the 100mV. When voltage of OSC2 pin is more than 100mV, the device would be triggered into single-ended detection mode which would prevent the device from communicating.
But e2e also said that"I know this is a lot of information, but hopefully it gives you all the information you need to understand and resolve your issue. It is recommended to have about 200mV of margin between the maximum comparator detection threshold of 150mV and the lowest peak voltage of the OSC2 waveform. So if you can adjust the circuit such that the OSC2 min level is about 350mV, should not see any stability issues."
I feel confused that in the first quotation the voltage of OSC2 should be less than 100mV, but in the second quotation the min level of OSC2 should be 350mV.
Q2. The case in E2E recommend that the way to reduce the current flowing through the crystal and load capacitors is to add a series dampening resistor between the OSC1 (amplifier output) and the crystal to restrict the current flow.
But in customer's PCB, there is a series dampening resistor between the crystal and OSC2 instead of OSC1. Could such resistor be able to reduce the flowing?
YOURS
NAN