Team,
From the D/S of the TCA9617B, we can see that we require VccA<=VccB. May I check with you about the reason why we have this requirement?
And what may happen if the VccA&B can't meet the D/S requirement? Thanks!
Qiang Ren
This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
Team,
From the D/S of the TCA9617B, we can see that we require VccA<=VccB. May I check with you about the reason why we have this requirement?
And what may happen if the VccA&B can't meet the D/S requirement? Thanks!
Qiang Ren
Hi Qiang,
This device was defined and designed to support VCCA <= VCCB for proper usage. I believe this supply voltage requirement is also needed to properly setup the VILC spec that helps to decide which side is driving a low-logic signal.
If VCCA and VCCB can't meet the D/S requirement, then TI cannot guarantee the electrical specifications in the datasheet, although the device may work with something different than VCCA <= VCCB. I have completed much testing on this device with VCCA > VCCB, so I cannot comment on what else might happen with this device if used that way.
Regards,
Tyler